drum118
Superstar
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Is it a FLAW??While the TTC has commissioners on its board who don't use public transit, it's the same elsewhere...
A major malfunction at Major Mackenzie Drive
York Region’s latest bus rapid transit project has a major flaw at Major Mackenzie Drive in Richmond Hill
From link.
Schematic of new Major Mackenzie Viva bus stop at Yonge Street – access is only permitted from the south, at Hopkins Street/Elmwood Avenue (from VivaNext website)
Pedestrian crosses Yonge Street from the Major Mackenzie Drive intersection. This is the fastest and most direct route to the new Viva stops, but it is prohibited – pedestrians are expected to walk down to the next traffic lights, push the beg button and wait for a walk signal to cross and backtrack to the stop platforms.
Looking north towards Major Mackenzie Drive – note the temporary “no pedestrian access” signs on the north side of the platform
The sanctioned access point to the Major Mackenzie Drive Viva bus stop, where pedestrians must beg to get to the bus platforms
Just because there is a justification doesn't make it any less of a flaw. If the station requires the pedestrian to walk 200m to connect to a local bus (roughly the distance of the Spadina tunnel), wait through 2 crossing signals, and the layout pushes pedestrians to take dangerous shortcuts, its a flawed design. Flawed doesn't necessarily mean there isn't any merit to how its designed, it just means that there are serious issues with how its designed.Is it a FLAW??
Need to go back around 2000's and look at what RH was looking at in the way of getting transit through the downtown area that is narrow.
At a Big Move meeting I was asked to sit in with RH folks, we talked about various options of getting transit through the downtown to the point they had been looking at a tunnel starting south of Major Mack and surfacing at a number of locations north of the Downtown where the road was wider.
There was the thought that the tunnel could be for transit only with stations to 4-6 lanes to take through traffic under the Town and leaving the surface for local use.
The best option as far as I am concern is a 4-6 lane tunnel with stations that will have to be deep to get under the existing foundations so stations can be built. The tunnel will be able to support an LRT down the road like the BRT will.
By having the station where it is, allows the ability to have this tunnel without ripping the whole intersection and buildings up to put this tunnel in at some point in time.
Anyway, wrong thread.
How about they put the cars in the tunnel and leave the buses on dedicated lanes on the surface? Or just close the street off from cars all together.Is it a FLAW??
Need to go back around 2000's and look at what RH was looking at in the way of getting transit through the downtown area that is narrow.
At a Big Move meeting I was asked to sit in with RH folks, we talked about various options of getting transit through the downtown to the point they had been looking at a tunnel starting south of Major Mack and surfacing at a number of locations north of the Downtown where the road was wider.
There was the thought that the tunnel could be for transit only with stations to 4-6 lanes to take through traffic under the Town and leaving the surface for local use.
The best option as far as I am concern is a 4-6 lane tunnel with stations that will have to be deep to get under the existing foundations so stations can be built. The tunnel will be able to support an LRT down the road like the BRT will.
By having the station where it is, allows the ability to have this tunnel without ripping the whole intersection and buildings up to put this tunnel in at some point in time.
Anyway, wrong thread.
Probably something similar to Leslie/LakeshoreIm curious to see how this would even work. Eastbound streetcars currently get held up by traffic turning onto Brown's Line, but more significantly by traffic turning into the No Frills plaza on 37th street.
Just because something bad (like management not using the system) is common doesn't make it less bad?While the TTC has commissioners on its board who don't use public transit, it's the same elsewhere...
A major malfunction at Major Mackenzie Drive
Expect an increase for Toronto in 2022, when the Line 5 Crosstown LRT is added to it. A further, but smaller, increase in 2023, when the Line 6 Finch West LRT is added as well.
Presumably they'd list that separately - if at all. They don't list Line 4, now.Expect an increase for Toronto in 2022, when the Line 5 Crosstown LRT is added to it. A further, but smaller, increase in 2023, when the Line 6 Finch West LRT is added as well.
To be fair, Ottawa's system is more of a Light Metro than an LRT line. Keep in mind the line is fully grade-separated plus the line is equipped with ATC/ATO throughout the full route. All the more reason REM-style vehicles should've been used. Nice to see our streetcar system surpassed the C-Train in Calgary. The last time I checked, Calgary was ahead of us in terms of ridership per mile.Wait wth. Ottawa is number 1? That's crazy. Talk about pent up demand.
(also why can I only see your image on mobile?)
To be fair, Ottawa's system is more of a Light Metro than an LRT line. Keep in mind the line is fully grade-separated plus the line is equipped with ATC/ATO throughout the full route. All the more reason REM-style vehicles should've been used. Nice to see our streetcar system surpassed the C-Train in Calgary. The last time I checked, Calgary was ahead of us in terms of ridership per mile.
Honestly its not a good thing. The O-train being an LRT was one of the biggest mistakes in Canadian transit planning (ok that might be an exaggeration but its still quite bad).Wait wth. Ottawa is number 1? That's crazy. Talk about pent up demand.
(also why can I only see your image on mobile?)