[Eug]

The article suggests there wasn't a contract. I understand what you're saying, but I wonder if the lack of a contract (if true) makes a significant difference in this context.

 

[DavidH]

The article suggests there wasn't a contract. I w
understand what you're saying, but I wonder if the lack of a contract (if true) makes a significant difference in this context.

At the very least, there would have been a verbal agreement, implying a verbal contract.

I think you'd still have to sue to get the money back, and you wouldn't have much of a case unless you could prove nondelivery of services. There is no mechanism to just take money away from a contractor - nor should there ever be.

 

[Eug]

Heh. Contractor = bed buddy... if you can get away with it.

 

[DavidH]

Heh. Contractor = bed buddy... if you can get away with it.

Doesn't sound like it was worth it for him.

 

[Eug]

But definitely worth it for her.

 

[DavidH]

But definitely worth it for her.

There's a moral in there somewhere.

 

[Cranky Old Fart]

and now the Wife surely knows LOL !

 

[kEiThZ]

Tip of the iceberg. I wonder what we'd find if we looked into large construction contracts.

No wonder subways cost $300M/km!

 

[drum118]

Tip of the iceberg. I wonder what we'd find if we looked into large construction contracts.

No wonder subways cost $300M/km!

It the point of that Iceberg and I understand there a lot of writers doing some real digging.

The digging is going to find some real nice stuff and long over due.

 

[Cranky Old Fart]

It the point of that Iceberg and I understand there a lot of writers doing some real digging.

The digging is going to find some real nice stuff and long over due.

I hope Howard Moscoe is a major feature of that mining project

 

[kettal]

The executive has been fired. Contract has been cancelled.

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/ttc/article/777025--ttc-exec-fired-girlfriend-loses-50-000-contract