News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

A

AlvinofDiaspar

Guest
From Building.ca

Quantum leap

WATERLOO, Ont. - Toronto firm Kuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg Architects, and laboratory specialists HDR Architecture, are designing a new $70-million complex for Quantum Computing and Nanotechnology at the University of Waterloo. The team beat out more than 20 others who were interested in designing the building.

"There was an interview process, and they certainly look at your design credentials, and we just had good chemistry," says design architect Mitchell Hall. "We knew there were cost issues from the beginning, we'd done our homework and planned accordingly."

The site for this 225,000-sq.-ft. project is a snug fit, but it's also strategically located, so that interaction between engineering, science and mathematics disciplines is made easier. "Luckily, our client is very interested in providing interaction and creating spaces for that. Space was programmed in from the very beginning and we have an atrium with lounge spaces to encourage these levels of interaction between the groups," Hall says.

It can be a daunting task to create what will be a publicly accessible building that's also home to some very sophisticated and delicate laboratories, particularly on a site where space is an issue.

"As far as the technical aspects of architecture go, that's something you can learn if you have the time and the patience. We're used to taking on projects that we haven't done before," Hall says.

Hall and lead architect Marianne McKenna had to come up with an elegant plan that would make it all come together. In order to keep the facility from being a towering monstrosity, they're proposing that a portion of the building be buried in the ground. Not only will this preserve green space on the campus and give it the benefits of a green roof, it turns out that nanotechnology and quantum computing labs are very picky about things like vibrations and solar radiation, so putting them underground is ideal.

Above ground, a bar levitates over this landscaped section, which Hall refers to as the "plinth." That bar is designed in two pieces to reflect the dual disciplines. A materials palette hasn't been settled upon yet, as universities are notoriously budget conscious, but whichever products and finishes are used, they will be employed in a unique manner.

"We really enjoy exploring materials," he explains. "The structure of the nanotechnology section is based on an abstraction of a carbon nanotube. And the [quantum computing] bar will have something to do with microchips and plastics."

There will be an emphasis on sustainability, with recycled materials used where possible. In addition to the green roof, KPMB is planning an outside green wall of living plants. The Quantum Computing and Nanotechnology building will be a metaphorical and physical bridge between disciplines.

"The building has bridge-like qualities," Hall says. "On campus, there's a series of landscaped courtyards and often there are pedestrian bridges overtop or tunnels underneath. We need to make the connection to the environment and connect with math, physics, biology and computing, all of which play a part in nanotechnology and quantum computing."

The facility already has $50 million of its budget, thanks to a huge donation, and the team expects to be tendering within a year, and then plan for a 24 to 48 month construction period.

AoD
 
( As reported by babel, thanks to his KPMB mole, last year ).
 
Apparently this will involve some of the same team who worked on the National Ballet School, another institutional project which involved building on a very tight site.

This building will be quite large. I look forward to seeing a rendering.
 
Here are some various sketches and models I have seen. They probably aren't very final.

2006-04apr-04-nanoquant-overhead.jpg

2006-04apr-04-nanoquant-west.jpg

2006-04apr-04-nanoquant-northwest.jpg

0406iqcnano.gif
 
Thanks for posting otto. It's still quite neat, considering we have nothing to look at whatsoever before.

AoD
 
Science students aren't one bit pleased about this building, as the site (referred to as the B2 Green) is fairly important to their orientation week activities.

As a math student, my only concern is that the bridge to the math building might be build through a student lounge space which is pretty well used at the moment. Based on that model (though it is likely hardly final), it seems the bridge will be going into the SW stairwell of the MC building.

I really appreciate hearing something about this, as my internet searches have yielded nothing so far. I must say, however, that I think I will miss having that open area. It allows some nice views of Laurel creek for the otherwise pretty brutal concrete surroundings of that courtyard (Peter Russel Rock Garden, I think) to the right of the Nano building. It's probably for the best, I suppose.
 
At nearly four years without any updates, I figured it was about time that the coldest thread in this forum got some action. Here y'are, 14,000 words worth:

UWaterlooQuantum0.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum1.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum1pano.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum2.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum3.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum4.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum5.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum6.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum7.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum8.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum10.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum11.jpg


UWaterlooQuantum12.jpg


Comments especially appreciated from Waterloo-weegians.

42
 
The blue sections reminds me a lot of KMPB's Rotman project.

I love how University of Waterloo is adding vibrant colours to their campus to offset the tiring overuse of brown brick, yet still using a modernist design aesthetic to maintain the modernist feel of the campus. It's a tasteful and effective solution to the problem of dullness and lack of colour.
 
Not sure how colourful dark blue is, but...? I have to say that I don't hate it, but it does remind me a lot of a 1970's university building - replace the curtainwall with a brick veneer and some slit windows, and the metal elements with precast concrete panels with odd shaped windows. I hate to say it, but it already looks dated. That is not to say that is not a worthwhile building and that the building from the 70's I am referring to is bad - on the contrary, just I find it amusing that they should replicate this for something so rooted in the future.

pee five
 
I go to Waterloo, so I see this building everyday, I don't know...something about it makes me feel like in 10 years it will be extremely outdated, same thing goes for the new engineering building at the east end of campus.
 
I go to Waterloo, so I see this building everyday, I don't know...something about it makes me feel like in 10 years it will be extremely outdated, same thing goes for the new engineering building at the east end of campus.

Well that's still a huge improvement considering most of the campus buildings look ancient.
 
Not sure how colourful dark blue is, but...? I have to say that I don't hate it, but it does remind me a lot of a 1970's university building - replace the curtainwall with a brick veneer and some slit windows, and the metal elements with precast concrete panels with odd shaped windows. I hate to say it, but it already looks dated. That is not to say that is not a worthwhile building and that the building from the 70's I am referring to is bad - on the contrary, just I find it amusing that they should replicate this for something so rooted in the future.

Given architectural fashion (and actually, I'd identify that pinstripe look more with the 60s--and by metal elements, I suppose you're suggesting some kind of Breuer-esque concrete-coffer treatment), the retro-allusion/influence is probably altogether intentional, rendering your "dated" judgment redundant and, well, dated in itself. Believe it or not, 60s campustecture is "in".
 
Given architectural fashion (and actually, I'd identify that pinstripe look more with the 60s--and by metal elements, I suppose you're suggesting some kind of Breuer-esque concrete-coffer treatment), the retro-allusion/influence is probably altogether intentional, rendering your "dated" judgment redundant and, well, dated in itself. Believe it or not, 60s campustecture is "in".

Regency stripe, not pinstripe. Think 1820s:

http://www.historicstyle.com/traditional/1940to1950/papers/regency_bluwhi.htm

UWaterlooQuantum11.jpg
 

Back
Top