News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.3K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

M II A II R II K

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
3,944
Reaction score
1,061
Unhealthy neighbourhoods play big role in obesity, diabetes epidemic


May. 16, 2011

By LISA ROCHON

gam-masthead-red.png


Read More: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...mic/article2024476/singlepage/#articlecontent


Cities’ neighbourhoods have long been ranked, like Hollywood stars, according to their beauty and magnetic personalities. But cities are now being increasingly divided into healthy and sick zones. If you live in downtown Vancouver or New York, where the tree canopy is lush and you can easily walk to an organic café or a yoga class, you belong to a privileged class not only because of the real estate values in your neighbourhood but because you’re likely to have a higher life expectancy. This is the new crisis of cities: Badly designed neighbourhoods are literally sapping people of their ability to live fully.

- Most of Canada’s growth comes from immigrants, but the troubling fact is that Hispanics, blacks and South Asians are genetically predisposed to diabetes. Because of the compounding of these forces, you and your neighbours can expect a lower life expectancy. A poor diet, high in saturated fat and low on fruits and vegetables, causes excess weight. Once obesity sets in, especially if it develops at a young age, type 2 diabetes usually follows. A sedentary lifestyle fuels the problem.

- That’s why some medical researchers and health offices are joining forces with urban planners to design neighbourhoods that are more conducive to activity. Healthy eating combined with increases in physical exercise – walking with the kids to school or biking to the cinema – would help to mitigate the rise in the prevalence of obesity over the last two decades. They say that Canadians need to embrace the Danish model of urban wellness, or suffer a health disaster.

- People who live in the northern, unwalkable fringes of low-income Toronto, or across the border in the marginalized, dehumanized neighbourhoods of New York’s East Harlem and South Bronx will live about 20 fewer years than those in downtown, vibrant neighbourhoods, according to a 2007 report by the City University of New York’s Campaign Against Diabetes and the Public Health Association of New York City. In the past 10 years, the number of New Yorkers diagnosed with diabetes has increased by 250 per cent. Meanwhile, in the beautiful neighbourhoods of Manhattan, the rate of diabetes is six times lower.

- New York and Toronto share another harsh urban reality: Both cities top the charts in North America for numbers of high-rise residential towers. Half Toronto’s population lives in vertical towers, a citywide phenomenon that touches every ward. When a tower sits amid a variety of housing types in high-density neighbourhoods, where restaurants and retail can thrive, tower residents can engage with the street life. But in the northeast and northwest quadrants of Toronto, in neighbourhoods such as Malvern and Rexdale that have few sidewalks and no sensory enticements such as the Art Gallery of Ontario or the dramatically lit CN Tower, there’s little reason to engage in the outside world.

- The first Canadian study of its kind, published in 2007, the Atlas investigated 140 Toronto neighbourhoods over three years to examine the role of several factors – including community design, population density, access to healthy and unhealthy food – on the diabetes epidemic. Poverty and ethnicity were found to be key in the development of type 2 diabetes. The researchers also concluded that walking and transit times to recreation facilities in the city’s outlying neighbourhoods were as long as 40 minutes and 20 minutes, respectively, each way. It takes only 30 minutes of walking or moderate exercise, combined with a healthy diet, to cut the risk of diabetes in half. But a walk through a bleak or potentially dangerous neighbourhood is hardly inspiring, especially if the only nearby landmark is a highway.

- Given the crisis of deadening urbanity, medical health officers such as Peel Region’s David Mowat are not only dealing with water fluoridation and smoke-free zones, but also the crucial need to design better-connected, more walkable neighbourhoods with access to healthy food at grocery stores and restaurants. Double alleys of trees, dedicated bike lanes and wider sidewalks promise in the future to be written into zoning bylaws for communities such as Brampton, Ont., the population of which has an acute incidence of diabetes. Given that health care absorbs 40 per cent of Ontario’s budget, it seems only economically savvy for the provincial Ministry of Health to start funding the radical redesign of inner and outer suburbs. It’s cheaper to plant a row of trees, after all, than to put somebody on dialysis for life.

.....




web-ttl-urban-diab_1276187a.jpg
 
I really don't buy it ... stretch this out into the 905 and I bet you you'll see plenty of areas that don't have as high of obesity rates as some of the outer subrubs of Toronto and in terms of walkabilty they're likely very comparable. The other factors / income / ... probably weight in much much more.
 
In my (anecdotal) experience it's very obvious that people in general are slimmer in Toronto than in Mississauga. People in Mississauga often have more of a 'buff' appearance than their Toronto counter-parts. I prefer the slim long-lived alternative.

I attribute this to the suburban value combination of a meat-based diet and gym work-out focused on weights, etc.

HOWEVER, income and ethnicity/background are huge factors as well.
 
Health Dept: New Yorkers Get Their Exercise By Getting Around Town


http://www.streetsblog.org/2011/05/...rs-get-their-exercise-by-getting-around-town/


The New York City Department of Health is out with a new bulletin [PDF] articulating the public health benefits of walking, biking, and taking transit. Encouraging those modes — and curbing the amount we drive — will reduce deaths and injuries from traffic crashes, prevent lung disease by lowering exposure to air pollution, and improve cardiovascular health by increasing exercise.

The evidence is pretty overwhelming — just 30 minutes of walking or biking each weekday reduces your risk of premature death by 20 percent — and the department’s recommendations are clear: New Yorkers should drive less, and the city should build the infrastructure to make walking, biking, and riding transit as safe and convenient as possible. Most of the Health Department’s factoids have already been reported, like the life-saving improvements in air quality as a result of closing parts of Broadway to traffic. But one caught our eye as a new reminder of the importance of daily commute habits for your health.

While many think of going to the gym or for a jog as the key to staying in shape, a DOH survey found that New Yorkers get most of their physical activity as they go about their daily routine. The majority of New Yorkers who take transit to work, for example, get eleven minutes of physical activity each day from recreation. But they move for 57 minutes a day just to get around, whether it’s to walk to the bus or run some errands during lunch. New Yorkers who walk or bike to work get slightly more exercise than transit riders as part of their daily routine, while drivers get less than half as much. The city’s compact development and strong transit system are the key to incorporating activities that lower New Yorkers’ risk of diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

.....




DOHCommuteRecreation.jpg
 
My former boss always used to say "if suburbs cause people to get fat, then they also cause people to get pregnant".
 
this study is flawed which ignore studeis that people in suburbs are fatter than folks who live in high density areas

Ignore fatness? Isn't that the whole point that this study is trying to make (and failing)? There is no correlation at all between built form and obesity and diabetes based on that map.

The flaw of study is that it ignores income and poverty. In the US, the neighbourhoods with worst obesity and health issues are poor, dense, inner city neighbourhoods. The lack of fresh produce and grocery stores in poor inner cities, , or the inability to afford fresh produce, contributes more to the obesity and diabetes problem than anything else.

And you can see it on that map as well. The neighbourhoods with the highest rates of diabetes in Toronto are all poor neighbourhoods, regardless of built form: Parkdale, Jane-Finch, Malvern, Weston, Keelesdale. Inner city or suburban, it clearly doesn't matter.
 
I agree these kind of correlations are weak. It's really about wealth. What I mean is that people we think are average here in North America are no doubt heavy based on what would be a normal weight for an adult human from an evolutionary perspective. So wealth makes people a bit heavy. But obesity or extreme weight probably correlates on average with income more than anything.
 

Back
Top