dowlingm
Senior Member
11 LRCs gone to the scrapper
Nooo11 LRCs gone to the scrapper
This is a very valuable report!! My cocktail-napkin count gives a rough(!) total of 42 LRC cars still in service. A running tally is maintained in this post:11 LRCs gone to the scrapper
There is a push for Canadian content or a Canadian vendor.We're definitely in "early 2026", so any day now VIA ought to be announcing the selected partner for the long-range fleet replacement. Surely?
Besides Alstom, who else does Canada have? Could we see a contingent on the contract that if the company does not have a shop in Canada that they must build one in Canada?There is a push for Canadian content or a Canadian vendor.
Like the subway car deal with Alstom it will take time for them to adjust the tender to be Canadian. Or higher Canadian Content.
I don't know if they are going to do that but giving it to Siemens would be a political disaster unless they plan to open a manufacturing facility here.
But what do I know?
I think as long as they are not built in the US the public would feel better about it. Japan maybe?
im just worried that the push for canadian content would drive the costs up far more than the benefits. i would rather spend $1B on the right trains over $1.5B and 2 more years just to set up a canadian shop.Besides Alstom, who else does Canada have? Could we see a contingent on the contract that if the company does not have a shop in Canada that they must build one in Canada?
Is the lower cost worth the political cost? There are already some who ask why we are buying stuff for California. Just like having our ships and subs being built in Canada, even at a higher price and longer timelines, the political cost is too high not to.im just worried that the push for canadian content would drive the costs up far more than the benefits. i would rather spend $1B on the right trains over $1.5B and 2 more years just to set up a canadian shop.
its clear now that we no longer have much expertise outside of Alstom to manufacture rail vehicles at a competitive rate.
all arguments will go away if it shows that they are going to save a significant chunk of money. if the cost difference is minimal fine... but if its anything more than $50M and/or 6months for delivery time, its definitely going to be a compelling argumentIs the lower cost worth the political cost? There are already some who ask why we are buying stuff for California. Just like having our ships and subs being built in Canada, even at a higher price and longer timelines, the political cost is too high not to.
all arguments will go away if it shows that they are going to save a significant chunk of money. if the cost difference is minimal fine... but if its anything more than $50M and/or 6months for delivery time, its definitely going to be a compelling argument
Not to mention we have ZERO expertise in new build intercity passenger rolling stock since the LRCs. sure bilevel personnel is transferrable but its still quite different from high floor long distance coaches.
The process should be similar. There is a spec and you assemble it together as required. It's like a kit.all arguments will go away if it shows that they are going to save a significant chunk of money. if the cost difference is minimal fine... but if its anything more than $50M and/or 6months for delivery time, its definitely going to be a compelling argument
Not to mention we have ZERO expertise in new build intercity passenger rolling stock since the LRCs. sure bilevel personnel is transferrable but its still quite different from high floor long distance coaches.
if it only was that simple. even with heavily prescripted specs there is still room for design interpretation that sets manufacturers apart from eachother.The process should be similar. There is a spec and you assemble it together as required. It's like a kit.
You have a jig that builds the shell. The wirring harness has a diagram and it connects to modules and switches.
You would need a facility or build a new facility to manufacture them. I don't know if thunder Bay or Kingston currently has capacity if Alstom built them.
Does CAD have space or are they busy doing refurbs?
What happened to the IRSI building in Moncton? Is it still empty?
Building a new facility will take a year just to build the building and would delay the project by a year.
From what I recall from discussing the Corridor procurement, the CETA trade agreement precludes any buy-Canadian and local requirements which would constrain European manufacturers in their ability to offer any trains from their domestic production lines. There are excemptions, but they only cover transit networks in Ontario and Quebec, not intercity railroads…There is a push for Canadian content or a Canadian vendor.
Like the subway car deal with Alstom it will take time for them to adjust the tender to be Canadian. Or higher Canadian Content.
i like how we continually shoot ourselves in both feet and in our knees just to fulfil the virtue signally. no wonder govt contract costs skyrocket vs other countries.From what I recall from discussing the Corridor procurement, the CETA trade agreement precludes any buy-Canadian and local requirements which would constrain European manufacturers in their ability to offer any trains from their domestic production lines. There are excemptions, but they only cover transit networks in Ontario and Quebec, not intercity railroads…




