[lenaitch]

On the note of MUs, NA seriously needs to catch up when it comes to this. Is there anything new out there these days that are equivalent to RDCs that we can get?
It seems like were still stuck in the 60s everytime we talk about intercity type multiple units whether itd be diesel or electric. MUs are far superior when it comes to short consists for smaller routes such as the ones to northern ontario as you dont need to waste a loco that can pull 10+ cars for a 2 car operation, plus another loco as a "cab car"

The Northlander, the only train to northern Ontario not counting the Canadian, typically consisted of three passenger-carrying cars and could be longer if bookings increased. It would be interesting to know if there is a magic line where the costs of operating self-propelled units vs. loco-hauled diverge. I suppose the other argument, at least from a smaller road like ONR, is the locomotive power is simply part of their fleet and can probably be swapped out as needed.

 

[Bordercollie]

The Northlander, the only train to northern Ontario not counting the Canadian, typically consisted of three passenger-carrying cars and could be longer if bookings increased. It would be interesting to know if there is a magic line where the costs of operating self-propelled units vs. loco-hauled diverge. I suppose the other argument, at least from a smaller road like ONR, is the locomotive power is simply part of their fleet and can probably be swapped out as needed.

Don't forget that you need to pay per axle for the generator car that doesn't generate any revenue.
Semi low floor trains would be usefull on the route to the north since the platforms are low.
How about lease some GO Bi-levels and attach a cafe car? But you will need a locomotive with a HEP generator or haul around a generator car.

Are there any F59PH's available on the used market? They would have HEP and geared for passenger service. Amtrak has P42's and P40's that will be retiring but the parts will be difficult to get once the majority of the fleet is retired.

What happened to the failed MI-Train locomotives, did they get leased out?

 

[micheal_can]

The Northlander, the only train to northern Ontario not counting the Canadian, typically consisted of three passenger-carrying cars and could be longer if bookings increased. It would be interesting to know if there is a magic line where the costs of operating self-propelled units vs. loco-hauled diverge. I suppose the other argument, at least from a smaller road like ONR, is the locomotive power is simply part of their fleet and can probably be swapped out as needed.

Their passenger fleet is used equpiment, some from GO's original fleet. They use a regular engine that will do the job for it, Even the TEE was used equipment.

Don't forget that you need to pay per axle for the generator car that doesn't generate any revenue.
Semi low floor trains would be usefull on the route to the north since the platforms are low.
How about lease some GO Bi-levels and attach a cafe car? But you will need a locomotive with a HEP generator or haul around a generator car.

Are there any F59PH's available on the used market? They would have HEP and geared for passenger service. Amtrak has P42's and P40's that will be retiring but the parts will be difficult to get once the majority of the fleet is retired.

What happened to the failed MI-Train locomotives, did they get leased out?

I have always thought that one or 2 Bilevels would be better than a longer train. They could even turn a lower end into a snack car. As far as HEP, if an engine(s) were selected, there is no reason a HEP generator couldn't be installed.

 

[lenaitch]

I really don't have an opinion pro/con on the use of bi-levels but I imagine if they did they would have to be reconfigured. In addition to cafe/cafeteria space and space for luggage, I'm not sure commuter-grade seating works for long-haul (it was, what, 11 hours end-to-end?). The recent re-builds of the existing single-levels look quite nice.

ONR recently purchased a couple of used locos and turned them into APUs. I imagine their mindset is to keep their motive power fleet flexible rather than configuring some for passenger and limiting their options.

 

[micheal_can]

I really don't have an opinion pro/con on the use of bi-levels but I imagine if they did they would have to be reconfigured. In addition to cafe/cafeteria space and space for luggage, I'm not sure commuter-grade seating works for long-haul (it was, what, 11 hours end-to-end?). The recent re-builds of the existing single-levels look quite nice.

ONR recently purchased a couple of used locos and turned them into APUs. I imagine their mindset is to keep their motive power fleet flexible rather than configuring some for passenger and limiting their options.

They could change out the seats and reconfigure the cars as they see fit. It is the space that might work well for making a better train experience.

 

[Bordercollie]

Perhaps VIA could order dome cars like this to replace the stainless fleet?
Railway Gazette International: Rocky Mountaineer announces 'Rockies to the Red Rocks' luxury train.

Rocky Mountaineer announces ‘Rockies to the Red Rocks’ luxury train

USA: Luxury train operator Rocky Mountaineer has announced plans to launch a two-day 'Rockies to the Red Rocks' rail journey between Denver in Colorado and Moab in Utah during 2021. Passengers would stay overnight at a hotel in Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The new service will be in ...

www.railwaygazette.com

 

[smallspy]

I meant seriously. As in issue an RFI to purchase new ones.

What do you call the process that led to the purchase of the Siemen's equipment then?!? It wasn't serious?

You seem to think that the folks at VIA have been sitting on their hands for the past 30 years. I can assure you that they weren't. They had many plans for getting new (or refurbished) equipment to augment what they had, but every time it was kyboshed by the who are actually in charge - the Government.

Dan

 

[Darwinkgo]

Perhaps VIA could order dome cars like this to replace the stainless fleet?
Railway Gazette International: Rocky Mountaineer announces 'Rockies to the Red Rocks' luxury train.

Rocky Mountaineer announces ‘Rockies to the Red Rocks’ luxury train

USA: Luxury train operator Rocky Mountaineer has announced plans to launch a two-day 'Rockies to the Red Rocks' rail journey between Denver in Colorado and Moab in Utah during 2021. Passengers would stay overnight at a hotel in Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The new service will be in ...

www.railwaygazette.com

Think you ended up with the wrong link there:
Rocky Mountaineer orders luxury dome cars from Stadler

Rocky Mountaineer orders luxury dome cars from Stadler

CANADA: Luxury tourist train operator Rocky Mountaineer has awarded Stadler a contract to supply 10 new double-deck dome cars from 2018. 'We are constantly looking for ways to improve our guest experience which is the core of our business', said Rocky Mountaineer President Steve Sammut on May...

www.railwaygazette.com

 

[roger1818]

Perhaps VIA could order dome cars like this to replace the stainless fleet?

Think you ended up with the wrong link there:
Rocky Mountaineer orders luxury dome cars from Stadler

Rocky Mountaineer orders luxury dome cars from Stadler

CANADA: Luxury tourist train operator Rocky Mountaineer has awarded Stadler a contract to supply 10 new double-deck dome cars from 2018. 'We are constantly looking for ways to improve our guest experience which is the core of our business', said Rocky Mountaineer President Steve Sammut on May...

www.railwaygazette.com

They do look nice. Interesting that they seem to be a dinning car on the lower level and have regular seating on the upper. It is also interesting that, unlike Amtrak's Superliners, they don't allow travel between coaches on the upper level. I am guessing they are making each car self contained to remove the need to travel through the train. I assume that could be a modification though for a different customer.

I don't think the Skyline (and Park) cars are VIA's biggest issue on their long distance trains. If they are going to continue to offer long distance service, what they really need is new sleepers.

 

[nfitz]

1What do you call the process that led to the purchase of the Siemen's equipment then?!? It wasn't serious?

I was strictly talking about RDCs. Of course the Siemens process was serious.

Have they ever issued an RFI or RFQ for new self-powered cars?

If they are going to continue to offer long distance service, what they really need is new sleepers.

What happened to all the spare Renaissance sleepers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_(railcar) notes that there were 72 originally, but 29 were never completed and scrapped and 27 are in service. So where are the other 16? (presumably an error on that page)

(looking at https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/VIA_Rail_Canada#Active_Roster_2 I'd guess they got converted to baggage cars)

 

[Bordercollie]

They do look nice. Interesting that they seem to be a dinning car on the lower level and have regular seating on the upper. It is also interesting that, unlike Amtrak's Superliners, they don't allow travel between coaches on the upper level. I am guessing they are making each car self contained to remove the need to travel through the train. I assume that could be a modification though for a different customer.

I don't think the Skyline (and Park) cars are VIA's biggest issue on their long distance trains. If they are going to continue to offer long distance service, what they really need is new sleepers.

I'm sure people can travel between cars on the lower level.
Why do people need to travel between cars on both levels?(If that's what you meant?).
Instead of dining on the lower floor they could be bunks for sleeping. Or on the top with skylights would be nice. Watch the stars while you sleep.

 

[roger1818]

I'm sure people can travel between cars on the lower level.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. On the Superliners, the lower level only spans between the trucks since there isn't enough clearance to have two full levels above the trucks.

Why do people need to travel between cars on both levels?(If that's what you meant?).

It isn't.

Instead of dining on the lower floor they could be bunks for sleeping. Or on the top with skylights would be nice. Watch the stars while you sleep.

In the summer skylights would wake you up kind of early. Not sure how many people would want that.

 

[EnviroTO]

Seems like a fare structure where travel and accommodation are split out would make the issue of company expense policies go away so easily. There are many railways where base transportation plus upgrades for speed, class, and sleepers is added on.

 

[smallspy]

Have they ever issued an RFI or RFQ for new self-powered cars?

The process that resulted in the Siemens order allowed for (and received) a bid of self-propelled cars.

But have they gone through an RFI or RFQ? Not to the best of my knowledge, no. But that's also because this seems to be the first RFI or RFQ (or any sort of open-bidding process) since the process that resulted in the LRC cars in 1981.

That doesn't mean that they haven't bid on cars, self-propelled or not, when given the chance.

Dan

 

[roger1818]

What happened to all the spare Renaissance sleepers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_(railcar) notes that there were 72 originally, but 29 were never completed and scrapped and 27 are in service. So where are the other 16? (presumably an error on that page)

(looking at https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/VIA_Rail_Canada#Active_Roster_2 I'd guess they got converted to baggage cars)

If you look on the Wikipedia page you first linked, it says: "Via rebuilt fifteen of the sleepers into dining and baggage cars." That leaves 1 missing, so there is probably an error somewhere on the Wikipedia page (it also says "Thirty-three carriages never entered service, remaining in store at Thunder Bay." which also doesn't add up).