Bordercollie
Senior Member
But was that an assumption without a guarantee from the host railway? Need to hold them to it. Penalties if a certain threshold is not achieved.
Or could VIA own that third track exclusively?
But was that an assumption without a guarantee from the host railway? Need to hold them to it. Penalties if a certain threshold is not achieved.
But was that an assumption without a guarantee from the host railway? Need to hold them to it. Penalties if a certain threshold is not achieved.
Or could VIA own that third track exclusively?
Or could VIA own that third track exclusively?
Without going into any specifics which could irritate any company I work (or worked) for or its suppliers (or client’s suppliers), CP seems to be much opener to such an approach than CN…You would have to ask CN. Anecdotally, one hears that they are not comfortable with that kind of arrangement. The GO infrastructure on CN near Hamilton and between Bramalea and Georgetown has some elements that were built for GO and the contract between GO and CN allows GO some improved rights to use of that part of the infrastructure that they have paid for.
- Paul
Yup. Lots of examples in the west (even if some interactions involved protracted court cases). Absence makes the heart grow stronger perhaps. Or experience makes finding a price easier, and helps set realistic expectations from both sides.Without going into any specifics which could irritate any company I work (or worked) for or its suppliers (or client’s suppliers), CP seems to be much opener to such an approach than CN…
If VIA is allowed to lift it's federal mask/vaccine mandate/requirement before the airlines, the airlines will be kicking and screaming.
The government just announced the end of the vaccination mandates. Personally, I regret that decision (from a vaccinated passenger‘s point-of-view), but it should really make the life of the rail operators and their staff easier:The whole Federal Transportation COVID mitigation policy needs to be updated to reflect current realities. Airports, Railways, Cruse ships etc. all have an additional burden that very few to no other developed countries currently have.
It make sense though. COVID is becoming something hospitals are starting to be able to manage. A large portion of the population is now vaccinated, symptoms are milder, and there are successful treatments available. I’d say it’s much safer now than it was at the height of the pandemic. We’ll see what the fall brings, thoughThe government just announced the end of the vaccination mandates. Personally, I regret that decision (from a vaccinated passenger‘s point-of-view), but it should really make the life of the rail operators and their staff easier:
It absolutely makes sense, I just personally prefer to know that all the folks around me are vaccinated like myself, but it‘s always been difficult to enforce and also increasingly difficult to justify…It make sense though. COVID is becoming something hospitals are starting to be able to manage. A large portion of the population is now vaccinated, symptoms are milder, and there are successful treatments available. I’d say it’s much safer now than it was at the height of the pandemic. We’ll see what the fall brings, though
Covid is still causing staffing issues, at least at the hospital I work at (large tertiary care hospital in Toronto). A Covid+ staff has to stay away for 7 days from symptom onset.It make sense though. COVID is becoming something hospitals are starting to be able to manage. A large portion of the population is now vaccinated, symptoms are milder, and there are successful treatments available. I’d say it’s much safer now than it was at the height of the pandemic. We’ll see what the fall brings, though
Interestingly, that wasn't my take-away from this article.With friends like these....
Supposed Canadian rail advocate calling for the dissolution and privatization of VIA.
![]()
VIA Rail’s Existential Problem? It Never Existed - Railway Age
Cynthia Garneau on May 20 gave up VIA Rail Canada leadership with two years remaining in her nominal tenure.www.railwayage.com
Not that such ideas shouldn't be considered. But I tend to discount anybody that mentions Brightline without understanding how much of Brightline is based on real estate development.
I think it’s the same physical train. In Canada, it has always run as a VIA train (with VIA crew) for train number purposes despite it using Amtrak equipment.I note that the Amtrak website says '2 trains' with one terminating at CBN (Canadian Border New York) and then, after an 11 minute wait you depart on train 2. Are there really two physical trains, one going to the border on one side then an 11 minute walk across the border to the other or ???
View attachment 408375
I'd think now that the federal government has ended VIA's HFR project, that by getting rid of VIA, passenger rail service might improve.Supposed Canadian rail advocate calling for the dissolution and privatization of VIA.




