archited
Senior Member
These are the potential bordering developments that surround the Warehouse District Park...
|
|
|
Burr oaks are super hardy -- I have a 60 year old one in my yard and it is massive. That said, they are super messy and park-goers will need to be prepared for a rain of small acorns pelting them around this time of year!They list the Burr Oak as native. I wonder how they rationalize thatt?
They have the most extensive range of any tree in N. America all the way from Manitoba and S. E. Saskatchewan to Texas. That said they are not native to this region which is the point I was trying to make.Burr oaks are super hardy -- I have a 60 year old one in my yard and it is massive. That said, they are super messy and park-goers will need to be prepared for a rain of small acorns pelting them around this time of year!
and if you are at all thinking about the future and climate change, conifers are probably not a good bet for the future when it will probably be warmer and drier and we know how good the city is at watering things.Glad to see a seemingly greater emphasis on deciduous trees than conifers. Conifers seem to be the default in some areas, and while it's nice they provide year round foliage. They're also incredibly messy, leaving cones, sap and needles all over the ground. They also basically make it impossible for anything else to grow below them as they acidify the soil. Also, Deciduous trees are way better at providing shade and shelter from the rain during summer time. Conifers have their place but personally prefer the look and overall impact of deciduous trees especially for urban areas and as street trees.
Absolutely. Our natural forests are generally pretty mixed, but I would say that aspen and birch parkland are probably more wide spread than spruce and pine. As you say that will probably become even more so in the near future considering climate change. My guess is that conifers have been preferred for their hardiness and evergreen foliage (potentially even for contributing to albedo in winter, which is a plus). But we should shift towards using a greater proportion of deciduous, even though they may not be as cold or drought hardy.and if you are at all thinking about the future and climate change, conifers are probably not a good bet for the future when it will probably be warmer and drier and we know how good the city is at watering things.
I know they have been a go to here for decades, but we have to think about the future not the past.
I posted this picture before of these cedars on 106 street that receive no care and are in the open. They do very well as long as they don’t have to tolerate salt and pollution. People like to plant them up against buildings as an accent.I agree, cedars are excellent plants, and they should probably be used more. Probably the reason they aren't though is they're very temperamental and basically can't survive an Edmonton winter without some kind of protection from the wind. This is why you'll often see them up against fences and the sides of houses. Junipers are very similar but are much hardier, I hardly ever see Junipers around though either.