Markster
Senior Member
Frankly, an at-grade crossing should be enough. We're building an LRT so we can get away with cheaper crossing infrastructure.
|
|
|
Have you really waked that corridor and see where residents currently used to get across that corridor???
There are at least 4 location being used until the fence went up.
There are 2-3 location that could be use for crossing if agreement can be had between the city and the landowners. Tims & McD are 2 locations and have to pull the photos out to see the other locations. I have photos of that corridor before construction was started on it as to locations being used to cross it.
What is the different between here and the University area that use private property today for a crossing???
Have you heard of easement right of way???
They have variations of pedestrian level crossings around the world.
I think a gate and lights would be good enough. A quieter bell would be nicer.
Surely that's for diesel locomotives.I'm not convinced. Portions of the Waterloo Spur are posted at 70, which if in MPH would be well beyond the Flexity's top speed of 80 km/h.
They have variations of pedestrian level crossings around the world.
I think a gate and lights would be good enough. A quieter bell would be nicer.
They also don't have motorized gates that can freeze and malfunction in our cold weather. They just need to make sure people can't run/bike across the tracks without slowing them down.Calgary has level crossings too.
They also don't have motorized gates that can freeze and malfunction in our cold weather.
Any updates on the ion light rail projects?