IanO
Superstar
Exciting times. This is a phenomenal area that is underserved by multi-family options.
|
|
|
- Thread starter IanO
- Start date
thommyjo
Senior Member
What might windsor park 2,3,4 look like to improve the multi family options?
IanO
Superstar
In due time... but I suspect you will see some continuity to tie things in and some evolution...
IanO
Superstar
From that most recent video a few pages back.
archited
Senior Member
This could have been so much more exciting!
LibraLibro
New Member
Very underwhelming design for the area.
Gronk!
Senior Member
IanO
Superstar
500m3 pour right there.
David A
Senior Member
There is a long history of city councilors being in favor of more density in principle or in other areas, but not in theirs. I find some of our politicians pompousness and duplicity a bit insufferable
CplKlinger
Senior Member
It's just politics; they cover for each other. Councilors can vote against the requests in their specific wards to placate the local opposition, while being rest assured that they won't jeopardize progress because there's already more than enough votes to approve the proposal.
David A
Senior Member
Oh, I am aware of that. I would just like a little more consistency and honesty, but perhaps that is too much to ask of them.
Gus Haynes
Active Member
It could be worse. I guess I'd rather have councilors who play this wink-wink game with symbolic and deliberately meaningless votes against density than a council that uniformly opposes density.
David A
Senior Member
I don't find vote for me, it could be worse very motivating and I think that explains the outcomes of some recent elections.
I would prefer to have someone who I feel I know where they stand, even if I don't agree with everything than a bunch of weasels
I would prefer to have someone who I feel I know where they stand, even if I don't agree with everything than a bunch of weasels