David A
Senior Member
I don't think having a city more attractive and appealing to visitors and one appealing to residents needs to be trade off. Say for instance, visitors would like a nice variety of stores and services in the downtown central area and a safe clean environment. Wouldn't residents who live nearby also want that, or maybe they just don't count in this city?Oh, totally! There’s lots of examples of people enjoying visiting here. But when we zoom out to surveys, travel patterns, hotel usage, tourism numbers…it’s clear that Edmonton is not a leader for visiting. Part of that is perceptions, part of that is also reality. Our city is at a very different level of “maturity” vs the other big cities in Canada in terms of connectivity, transit, quality hotels, entertainment options, downtown beauty/attractiveness, etc.
Many of the things that matter to visitors (hotels, entertainment) are less important to residents and vice versa when it comes to schools & affordability.
On the maturity side, Edmonton as a city is around 120 years old, so yes not terribly old on a world wide scale, but old enough to be a a fairly established place by now. However, then that does not explain why downtown was more vibrant 10, 20 or 40 years ago. So if the issue is maturity, perhaps we somehow regressed and have become a teenager that does not want to grow up.




