News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
I can tolerate delays.

If a bunch of routes do get scrapped though through decisions made by the new council I will be sad. ☹️

I guess a reminder to go vote and bug your friends/family to vote for candidates who support active transportation.
 
I can tolerate delays.

If a bunch of routes do get scrapped though through decisions made by the new council I will be sad. ☹️

I guess a reminder to go vote and bug your friends/family to vote for candidates who support active transportation.
Kingsway needs to happen, there are zero decent alternatives to biking to anything along it currently and the existing sidewalks are garbage.
 
I can tolerate delays.

If a bunch of routes do get scrapped though through decisions made by the new council I will be sad. ☹️

I guess a reminder to go vote and bug your friends/family to vote for candidates who support active transportation.
We should not tolerate delays.

These are simple projects compared to most city infrastructure.

Having sat in on a few conversations with some of the people working on these new paths, I’m not surprised by the delays. There was little sense of experience, competency, or excellence.

Depending on both the city election, and province’s continued meddling, we could see many of the not yet completed projects be cancelled. 2-3 year delays are not reasonable. This isn’t an LRT. It’s mostly some asphalt on a grassy ROW with a few light post relocations or tree removals….or it’s paint and pin-on curbs/speed bumps.
 
Having sat in on a few conversations with some of the people working on these new paths, I’m not surprised by the delays. There was little sense of experience, competency, or excellence.
Based on my interactions with the City staff assigned these projects, it does not seem like senior Admin viewed them as important but as a nuisance thrust on them by council. Every project has a new team made up of entirely junior/inexperienced staff with very minimal support and no coordination. It's pretty clear that Corbould wanted them to fail, don't know if the rest of the senior staff feels the same.
 
If the new council does halt this project, I will never forgive development companies like Westrich for donating tens of thousands of dollars to Cartmell's campaign and party. It's difficult to be excited about projects built by a company like Westrich when they give big money to a person who actively opposes providing safe ways for people to get to those new apartments without driving a car.
 
Last edited:
Sure feels like a lot of the construction contracts for these projects didn't even begin work until September-October. Anyone have any insights on why that might have been the case?
Also curious. I understand the City only has so many resources and thus not every civil project can start in May/June, but it is frustrating when they start a project late in the year, don’t finish it, and then sits idle for seven months through winter blocking lanes and/or sidewalks plus looking like a major eyesore.

106 st adjacent to Warehouse Park is a good example. They didn’t start construction till August, and currently they’re miles away from finishing the west side this year. If the weather turns in the next few weeks they’ll have no chance to finish it and it’ll sit blocking the street along our beautiful fancy new downtown central park all winter. If they started a month earlier they’d be finished no problem.
 
Perhaps a bit of an unrelated rant... but while it was technically a part of the Missing Sidewalks program, I was quite frustrated with the contractor who worked on the first portion of the 111 St path south of 34 Ave.

This section is now complete, but there was a good two months worth of a crosswalk being totally inaccessible with no detour signage. Parts of the road were dug up for new curb ramps/concrete work, but once those were done, the gap between the new concrete and road were left open for a good 3+ weeks. When the traffic islands were removed and repoured, there was no detour put in place, or closure signage. I even once came across the contractors doing concrete work with no barriers or signage in place and would have ridden through wet concrete if they hadn't called out to me. Multiple times I saw people trying to cross but not being able to and getting thrown directly out into a four lane road with no crossing. For a few weeks, the only way to cross the west side 34 Ave between Greenfield and Blue Quill was to take the lane on 111 Street southbound and attempt to hop onto the bus stop curb, or continue all the way to Saddleback Road.

I originally was in contact with the project manager but he just stopped responding to me when I raised these issues, and multiple 311 requests got nowhere. It's a non-issue now as everything is done, but a similar disruption for vehicle traffic would be totally unacceptable and it's frustrating that absolutely nothing was done to remedy the concern for a good two months. I finally got frustrated and sent an e-mail to Janz, who forwarded it again, but by the time they got back to me 2 months later, everything was done. Sigh.

At least with the work between Harry Ainlay and Greenfield, there were proper detour signs and barriers, but it appears to have been a different contractor. All this to say that perhaps (presumably) awarding to the lowest bidder on some of these active transport projects has some consequences.
 
Here's more background info I was given when inquiring to the late start of projects.

The 2025 programs, as well as those being carried over from 2024, are all being delivered through separate construction contracts and are being managed by different construction project managers (4 teams). Most of the work will take place consecutively, meaning that a construction contractor will finish one route before moving onto the next. Many of the routes are short and many will be constructed using adaptable measures, unlike the shared use paths which began construction in 2024.

Both 2024 and 2025 had construction start late in the season. In 2024, I was told certain routes experienced some unexpected design and procurement-related challenges.

At a council meeting before election break I believe council was told $75 million has been spent so far or committed to in contracts. Given what is proposed still for 2026 (the most amount of work of the three years 2024-26) and what is postponed from 2025 still and requiring work (plus 107Ave in 2027) - that's concerning.
 
At a council meeting before election break I believe council was told $75 million has been spent so far or committed to in contracts.
When Cartmell made the motion to pause construction on these, administration said that all contracts were signed, meaning that nothing could be paused or cancelled without risking penalties. Of course, he argued that risking the penalties was worthwhile :/
 
Not for 2026 though?
Shoot, you're right, I misunderstood them. There are signed design contracts, but not implementation ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAS

Back
Top