ehlow
Senior Member
Wow that would be a really nice street if there were storefronts & buildings beside it instead of an empty field.
Wow that would be a really nice street if there were storefronts & buildings beside it instead of an empty field.
Wow that would be a really nice street if there were storefronts & buildings beside it instead of an empty field.
If they had upgraded The Queensway section of the 501 Queen, that might showcase what direction they are going to. Unfortunately, they kept an unneeded South Kingsway stop, there is no true transit priority, and the eastern portion still has to be rebuilt.
![]()
Wow that would be a really nice street if there were storefronts & buildings beside it instead of an empty field.
It took a long time just to develop North York Centre, which is relatively short compared to the length of Highway 7. I'm not sure if there will be enough demand to completely develop Hwy 7, along with the dozens of other streets that are getting rapid transit.
Ya but those people will be using the Bathurst stop not oakwood. But just like the streetcars stop at too many stops it seems to be the same with the LRT stops especially east of Yonge but also the stop at Oakwood halfway between the Allen and Dufferin stop so was not needed. Of course residents are going to want the stop.There's also The Hill planned at Bathurst and Eglinton, and a ton of development happening at Yonge and Eglinton that's at least partially driven by the crosstown.
But why would the surface stops be as elaborate? Its outside so all you need is a stop with an enclosure where people can stand.Well, if you believe that any station without staff, elevators, escalators and fare gates is 2nd class, then yeah the surface stops are 2nd class by that definition.
At the risk of repeating what has probably been said 100 times, if you're looking at speed, frequency, reliability, a high quality ride and high levels of service, then LRT isn't 2nd class.
We don't really know what the stops will look like in detail yet, but it's true the surface stops aren't as elaborate as the underground ones. However, this also means they are much cheaper to build, operate and maintain.
the stop at Oakwood halfway between the Allen and Dufferin stop so was not needed.
What I meant is its a close walk to Dufferin or the Allen stop.By that standard every stop on the entire line is "literally halfway between two other stops". maybe we should just build a line with a stop at Mt. Dennis and Kennedy?
The crosstown is also fairly bare bones, the subway stops are a whole lot simpler than what the TTC likes to build for its stations.
Can you get an wringer-washer? Nope, just automatic washers. What about black and white televisions for your home? Do you have a black and white monitor for your computer? And so on and so on...
Over a hundred years ago, one could build your own house. With only a hammer and nails, you could. No building permits, no inspections. What codes, there weren't any. The original codes were put in because the building trades wanted jobs for their own members. So bricks and mortar were required by the city as the first building codes were established.
Ya but those people will be using the Bathurst stop not oakwood. But just like the streetcars stop at too many stops it seems to be the same with the LRT stops especially east of Yonge but also the stop at Oakwood halfway between the Allen and Dufferin stop so was not needed. Of course residents are going to want the stop.




