Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Calendar
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
News
GLOBAL | Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
8.5K
0
News
GLOBAL | Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
39K
0
News
GLOBAL | Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
4.8K
0
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
There are active proposals on that stretch. It is a lot cheaper to build wood based walk ups. The land is cheaper. The structure is...
Today at 3:09 AM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Depends what you think of as significant. It certainly cannot hurt. And has helped where it has been implemented.
Today at 2:50 AM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Seems to have been very enforceable in parts of Elbow Park and Mount Royal, in cases I have knowledge of.
Yesterday at 9:50 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
I think for some questions they can be good, when there is a discreet project that there is a true binary. Like "put in place this tax...
Yesterday at 9:45 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Not exactly. Requires a court process with low odds of success on the developer's part. Depends on how it was written of course. Not all...
Yesterday at 9:33 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
I would say people aren't entirely knowledgeable about the power of restrictive covenants. Even owner groups I've engaged with (Mount...
Yesterday at 9:32 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
I would say that a lot of people when asked to make a binary choice will make the status quo choice, as contextualizing the entire...
Yesterday at 7:12 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Plebiscites aren't great. This argument is bogus. People would vote for no carbon taxes, yet would vote for strict environmental...
Yesterday at 6:35 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Roads, Highways & Infrastructure
.
Aside: We're (eventually) getting bypass roads!
Yesterday at 6:21 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Roads, Highways & Infrastructure
.
Does this help answer that?
Yesterday at 6:19 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
The cost savings are long term with lower service growth, not reducing costs today, as the city is still growing. The planning cost...
Yesterday at 6:10 PM
darwink
reacted to
YYCguy's post
in the thread
Roads, Highways & Infrastructure
with
Like
.
So no connection to/from Stoney Trail with the Memorial Drive extension? Is this intentional or a missed opportunity?
Tuesday at 11:16 PM
darwink
reacted to
MichaelS's post
in the thread
Roads, Highways & Infrastructure
with
Like
.
It has always been planned as simply a flyover, with no connecting ramps to/from Stoney. Most likely due to the spacing between...
Tuesday at 11:16 PM
darwink
reacted to
Surrealplaces's post
in the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
with
Like
.
From what I've seen, opposition to blanket zoning seems to be from people of all colors and sexes, but almost exclusively from people...
Tuesday at 9:43 PM
darwink
reacted to
Surrealplaces's post
in the thread
Calgary Transit
with
Like
.
I know with inflation pressures, etc.. this won't be a popular take, but we do some some of the lowest property taxes in the county. If...
Tuesday at 9:08 PM
Members
Back
Top