Or even add some highway numbers beyond. 427 and DVP perhaps for those driving in from the north. Here's a good example from Montreal of what it could say.

Sure, but what they'll do first is whatever the government says to do. So if the government changes, they'll magically find not only a different option - but they'll say it's better.

There's other locations around there. To the north is a huge storage facility and light industrial. There's the Costco to the west. There's that SmartCentre up on Laird (:)) Could even put a second deck on Greenwood Yard and use that. And why isn't underground with commercial built on top an...

If it took 9 hours to get to the southern coast of England from London, I think there were other issues! Only about 425 km from Heathrow to Penzance, on good roads!

That's kind of misleading when that's the peak rush-hour exception more than the rule. 15-minutes or better tells us we can rely on it, even on Sunday evenings.

Nothing like that can be approved until there's a new government.

Which would be along the lines of what Metrolinx suggested in 2008 (no idea what they were thinking for layover/turnback ... I'd think it could just be a dead-end like at Pearson).

That's up to Mississauga.

Did we? I doubt many on the Durham BRT are going to be doing much else than getting on Line 2 southbound - at least those still on the bus after it leaves UTS - which surely would also be a Scarborough hub. Kennedy should also remain a hub with access to GO.

Won't that add an unnecessary 401 crossing? Would it even stop between UTS and STC? Local service on Sheppard would be the LRT to UTS; I don't see much point building LRT and BRT on the same route; rapid transit on both routes would be better.

Only within the limitations of their contract. If they can't move the tunnels horizontally, or change a creek crossing to ground surface from 50-metres deep - then it won't find the cheapest way.

No - but it's cheaper and faster than dealing with all the utilities under the streets. On the other hand, because they have chosen to go so deep, it does given them flexibilities to put much shallower curves downtown, under buildings - which lets them claim that it need to be so deep because...

Would it? It's about the same distance from the old Dundas station to McMaster than it is from West Harbour. Though with the long term plans to terminate some trains in Aldershot, it may well make sense to extend an hourly train to Brantford with a stop in Dundas.

If it was worse than the arrivals at international terminal in Mumbai in the 1990s I'd be shocked. And that's before you take into account the transfer back then from the international terminal to the domestic terminal!

I was wondering if the differences between the two sections of bridge means that they were twinned after the initial construction of the Brantford Bypass in the 1960s (it wasn't connected to the 401 at Woodstock until the late 1980s, and the stretch from Brantford to Ancaster wasn't finished...