News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

Yeah, it's missing the smoking gun of how indeed the media and pollsters are conspiring to stop Ford.

Yeah, Doug "how can I be anti-Semitic? my doctor is Jewish, my lawyer is Jewish and my accountant is Jewish...oh and my wife is too" Ford is going to protect us from anti-Semitism.

Yes, and the guy who picked the hate-monger Andrew Lawton to run in London is such a protector of a tolerant, multicultural society. Please.

Sorry friend, I'm not the one that's being duped:


Andrew Layton is just one PC candidate in a riding he's unlikely to win. There's several NDPers in tight races vying to run our lives! The horror!
 
^Funny they mention someone praising Hitler's leadership skills in a video for an election severely lacking in leadership quality.

It's the ultimate showdown: misguided socialists vs the goon squad vs the ethically compromised power freaks.

Oh man, this is going to be one fun election night. At least I know my jaw won't be on the floor like when I watched the last US presidential election. This time any chance for surprise is out the window. I fully expect a vote for "change" here.
 
... There's several NDPers in tight races vying to run our lives! The horror!

Ain't nobody running my life, I don't mind telling ya. (This includes me half the time).

The true horror will be a majority government of any colour.
 
Andrew Layton is just one PC candidate in a riding he's unlikely to win. There's several NDPers in tight races vying to run our lives! The horror!

Actually London West is a riding that they traditionally have been strong in and could have won if it weren't for Ford/Lawton.

Nor is Lawton the "only" PC candidate that's either a hate-monger or ethically challenged.
 
Well our board's resident Ford apologist may be happy to know that the Liberals are vulnerable in St. Paul's. But they're vulnerable to the NDP, not the Conservatives.
 
Well our board's resident Ford apologist may be happy to know that the Liberals are vulnerable in St. Paul's. But they're vulnerable to the NDP, not the Conservatives.

Did I not predict this though? I clearly said in my earlier post that an NDP surge could allow the Tories to come up the middle and win. Here's the post in question:

Apart from the collapse in 2003, Conservatives' share of the vote has increased steadily in every election since. And yes, there is no popular incumbent running for the Liberals this time.

The Tories have a solid base in Forest Hill (the map I just looked at on my phone confirms my earlier statement was right). It's the outskirts of the riding where Liberals are drawing their support from (Fairbank, Davisville-Mt Pleasant, Humewood), but these areas could just as well slide into the NDP's camp - making St Paul's a three way race where the Tories could come up the middle and win.

Why is it so hard to believe some Liberal hemorrhaging would be towards the Conservatives' camp too? Oh yeah, Libs are too smart to vote Tory in your worldview.
 
Last edited:
Though before we all over-hail the "inevitability" of a NDP victory, a bit of a sobering poll from Ipsos/Global
https://globalnews.ca/news/4236201/ontario-election-poll-ndp-soften-pc-lead/
PC 37 (+1)
NDP 34 (-3)
Lib 22 (-1)
Oth 7 (+3)

I still would consider the PC the odds on favorite to get more seats (I do think NDP might get a bigger voter percentage) I personally don't take Ipsos polls into consideration. In 2014 Ipsos final poll had a 3-way tie with L-33, C-31, L-30, which got a lot of attention in the media because it sold the best "story" They also put out a "likely voters" poll last year that had the PC up by 6! over both Libs and NDP LOL (BTW Libs won by 8). The media really should put up the track records of the poll they put up. I am personally waiting for the next Ekos poll or if Nanos will ever get in the game.
 

Back
Top