News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.3K     0 

“Led by Premier Danielle Smith and a 15 member panel of UCP MLAs, business leaders, academics, and community representatives, this is part of a rigorous Government of Alberta consultation process.

“The goal is to shape Alberta’s future and strengthen our sovereignty within a united Canada. The panel is touring the province to hear how we can better protect ourselves from Ottawa’s attacks. A provincial referendum on some of these ideas is coming in 2026. What’s on that ballot will be informed by your feedback.

“Panelists will raise important ideas for discussion, including the Provincial Police Service, Alberta Pension Plan, tax collection changes, immigration, constitutional reform, and federal transfers and equalization.

“This is not a United Conservative Party event, but we know many of our supporters care deeply about these issues and may want to attend.”

Bwahahaha…

When you don’t know whether to laugh or cry, they say it’s better for you and your blood pressure to laugh.

Not a UCP event??? Of course not! Why would they waste their money when they can waste ours instead.
 
IMG_4015.jpeg
 
IMG_4024.jpeg


No wonder they want to eliminate the French component in labelling. Based on this response, they clearly haven't even mastered the English component yet.

"There is a large cost in not advertising products in 2 languages,..." WTF do they think they're saying here other than demonstrating that illiteracy to the rest of us?

It does however clearly demonstrate who should not be in charge of a police force, a pension plan, a political party, or a province.
 
View attachment 666360

No wonder they want to eliminate the French component in labelling. Based on this response, they clearly haven't even mastered the English component yet.

"There is a large cost in not advertising products in 2 languages,..." WTF do they think they're saying here other than demonstrating that illiteracy to the rest of us?

It does however clearly demonstrate who should not be in charge of a police force, a pension plan, a political party, or a province.
They're saying bilingual labeling is expensive because it mandates two types of labels (I think) but distributors can just... use the bilingual label? Why would they need two?
 

Back
Top