News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.5K     0 

License Plate 4 (standard white with red) got my vote, in no small part because it's the closest to the current plates (excepting those Oilers/Flames/Veteran plates).

Trying to put photographs on license plates while keeping both the plate number and the photograph legible is an exercise in futility.

Yes, as well as other issues, it does make it harder to read. Here is an interesting article on this:

 
Yes, as well as other issues, it does make it harder to read. Here is an interesting article on this:

A National Post article which I agree with, very rare. I like the community-designed plate they highlight too. Far more tasteful.
1760995113156.png
 
Sounds like the Notwithstanding Clause has been invoked. Some stories were up, and then quickly scrubbed. I hope that everyone understands what this means about their charter rights. Basically, you don't have them in Alberta.
Did I see right that Smith isn't even present in the Legislature while this attempt to force contract terms on teachers is going on?
 
The right to strike can't be denied. Ever. Can the federal government (our government) ever use the Constitution to fire Danielle Smith?
No. Under the constitution provinces are not a subordinate level of government under the feds, instead they are distinct and independent. This is very different from municipalities, which are a creation of the Municipalities Act and are in fact under the whim of the province.

This sucks and labour's response will have to be proportionally severe. As a family where a teacher is our sole breadwinner, pray for us. All we want is decent class size limits like every other province!!
 
I'm not sure why the notwithstanding clause would even come into play.

For better or worse, governments are within their rights to legislate people back to work. It happens with alarming regularity in Canada.

The response by unions will be interesting.
 
The landmark Supreme Court of Canada ruling
  • Who: The B.C. Teachers' Federation (BCTF) vs. the B.C. government.
  • What happened: The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the B.C. government had violated the teachers' freedom of association under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by stripping class size and composition protections from their collective agreements.
  • When: The ruling was made in November 2016.
  • Significance: The decision sent a strong message to governments across Canada to respect collective bargaining and cannot act unilaterally to remove these protections. It restored contract provisions on class size and composition that were in place in 2002.
 
I'm not sure why the notwithstanding clause would even come into play.

For better or worse, governments are within their rights to legislate people back to work. It happens with alarming regularity in Canada.

The response by unions will be interesting.
I did not think they would do it either. Ending the strike and forcing arbitration would totally be in their rights without it. However, the ATA would still have been able to challenge the legislation or pursue other forms of job action, like work to rule. This bill went full nuclear and not only ends the strike but forces a contract on the teachers. In addition it prohibits the contract from being challenged under any provincial or federal legislation (including the Alberta Human Rights Act), and forbids teachers from pursuing any other form of job action. To go that far requires the Notwithstanding clause.

Alberta has long played this game of not allowing teachers to negotiate work conditions as a provincial level, only wages (two tier bargaining). Placing the responsibility of "learning conditions" on the school boards, but then controlling the funding so that school boards don't actually have the freedom to do things like have class size limits. Which is what teachers are most mad about. Honestly, if the province brought forward a contract with class size/complexity limits in the realm of all the other provinces alongside the current wage offer, I am sure teachers would vote yes for it.

I'm not sure what their end game is here, as they have to know this option forces the other unions to get involved as this is an existential threat to the right to collective bargaining. Best I have got is that Smith is just the kind of person who likes to watch the world burn.
 

Back
Top