Best direction for the Green line at this point?

  • Go ahead with the current option of Eau Claire to Lynbrook and phase in extensions.

    Votes: 42 60.0%

  • Re-design the whole system

    Votes: 22 31.4%

  • Cancel it altogether

    Votes: 6 8.6%
  • Total voters
    70
Joborule said:
Auroa Business Park should have ample enough space. It's serving no purpose currently. It was designated to be the storage facility for the Nose Creek alignment I believe.
Click to expand...
Getting that far north is an issue. Centre St has a lot of utilities under it. Probably cheaper to take a row of houses out on either side of Centre than try to move all those utilities. Given how construction is now way more expensive, but houses are somewhat flat.
 
darwink said:
Getting that far north is an issue. Centre St has a lot of utilities under it. Probably cheaper to take a row of houses out on either side of Centre than try to move all those utilities. Given how construction is now way more expensive, but houses are somewhat flat.
Click to expand...
True, but with how the current project for the stub line is about what, ~6billion dollars? Would it be worth it to do say 8 Billion from North Pointe to Downtown or Highfield if it can make it that far within that price point? Seems a lot better ROI if you're going to be paying a lot up front of the first phase.
 
Joborule said:
True, but with how the current project for the stub line is about what, ~6billion dollars? Would it be worth it to do say 8 Billion from North Pointe to Downtown or Highfield if it can make it that far within that price point? Seems a lot better ROI if you're going to be paying a lot up front of the first phase.
Click to expand...
I suspect that's what the Green Line team likely wanted but when you have 3 levels of partners funding a project and only one partner is willing to absorb any sort of cost increase you get what you get.
 
Joborule said:
True, but with how the current project for the stub line is about what, ~6billion dollars? Would it be worth it to do say 8 Billion from North Pointe to Downtown or Highfield if it can make it that far within that price point? Seems a lot better ROI if you're going to be paying a lot up front of the first phase.
Click to expand...
The downtown tunnel ate the rest of the project.

The downtown tunnel is now gone.

Where the project ends up now is a total guess.

Buying Aspen Square, and making it grand central, solves many problems. The can even make it no tunnel, even stay on the south side of the CPR, and still be mostly functional, without breaking the Red and Blue lines (unlike the Steve Allen group proposal).
 
kora said:
Calgary used to be a leader and a model for other cities to follow when it comes to light rail. Now it's a cautionary tale. That's not what we want our city to be.
Click to expand...
There was a time when building Calgary up into a model city was a centrepiece of the Alberta Conservative agenda, and part of what made the PCs such a big tent, dominant party. Remember when Ralph Klein was the champion of the LRT network?

Now that UCP is a rural grievance party focused primarily on identity politics and scraping off just enough suburban and ex-urban Calgarians to maintain a slight seat advantage in the legislature. They have basically ceded most of Calgary to the NDP, which they can do so long as all the ridings outside Calgary, Edmonton and Lethbridge remain in lockstep with the party.
 
So the tunnel will now be nixxed for sure? Is that basically the conclusion?
 
Silence&Motion said:
There was a time when building Calgary up into a model city was a centrepiece of the Alberta Conservative agenda, and part of what made the PCs such a big tent, dominant party. Remember when Ralph Klein was the champion of the LRT network?

Now that UCP is a rural grievance party focused primarily on identity politics and scraping off just enough suburban and ex-urban Calgarians to maintain a slight seat advantage in the legislature. They have basically ceded most of Calgary to the NDP, which they can do so long as all the ridings outside Calgary, Edmonton and Lethbridge remain in lockstep with the party.
Click to expand...
I agree. I tend to lean right fiscally and think that robust transit investment is fully compatible with conservatism. It's far more cost effective than building more freeways and interchanges, allows people the opportunity to downsize to one or even no car, thus helping lower and middle income earners save money, and is certainly a more efficient way to lower carbon emissions than EV subsidies.

Unfortunately, as you've alluded to, the modern day UCP seems more interested in petty culture war fights than in actually building any sort of big tent.
 
darwink said:
The downtown tunnel ate the rest of the project.

The downtown tunnel is now gone.

Where the project ends up now is a total guess.

Buying Aspen Square, and making it grand central, solves many problems. The can even make it no tunnel, even stay on the south side of the CPR, and still be mostly functional, without breaking the Red and Blue lines (unlike the Steve Allen group proposal).
Click to expand...
Or, as you're advocating, make it elevated through downtown. Considering it's a low floor train, and it's going to be bridged over the Bow for the northern crossing, I don't think elevated is a bad trade off if it could contribute to significant savings.
 
Joborule said:
I don't think elevated is a bad trade off if it could contribute to significant savings.
Click to expand...
It would. Don't need to put a single pile into the bad soil if it really that bad, don't need to ever have empty volume if it is only mostly bad. Now it will create other problems, but whatever.

Here is the profile with the structures needed to clear in purple (CPR also needs 12 or 14m rail to structure iirc):
1725471724348.png
 
Definitely would be good to revisit the idea of elevated. It would solve a lot of headaches and get this through DT without intersecting the Blue/Red line.
 
How about a line from Seton to Chinook Centre. Skip the downtown. Not ideal by any means. I wonder how ridership would look given that people would have to transfer downtown.
 
Someone remind me what the CP clearance has to be? Doesn't really matter as the line would have to be even higher than that to clear the city parkade entrance off 9th Ave and the +15 that's there. I also don't know how you can support an elevated line with all that in the way. I'm not worried about the rest of the +15s along 2 Street, you can integrate them into an elevated line. The issue with elevated is where do you cross the CP tracks? Very few places can accommodate the turn radius required coupled with the need to cross the tracks. Every option comes with its own alignment affects, it's actually why I think they stick with what they have.
 
CalgaryTiger said:
Someone remind me what the CP clearance has to be? Doesn't really matter as the line would have to be even higher than that to clear the city parkade entrance off 9th Ave and the +15 that's there. I also don't know how you can support an elevated line with all that in the way. I'm not worried about the rest of the +15s along 2 Street, you can integrate them into an elevated line. The issue with elevated is where do you cross the CP tracks? Very few places can accommodate the turn radius required coupled with the need to cross the tracks. Every option comes with its own alignment affects, it's actually why I think they stick with what they have.
Click to expand...
If can do the turn slowly, can turn just fine. All a matter of trade offs. It is all a matter of optimization. Digging a big hole turns out after 7, 8 years of trying to mitigate it, turns out to be an awful nut to crack.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top