Sorry for all the pics, but I loooove this project.

179132
179133
179134
179135
179136
179137
179138
179139
 
I really don't get the point of the metal framing on the east end balcony on the third floor. The early renders didn't include it and I think the design looks cleaner without it. Anyone know what it's for? Also looks like the exterior staircase shown on the renders connecting the third and fourth floors didn't make it into the final design? Overall I really do like this project though.
 
Yeah the stairs didn't make it into the final design because the fourth floor was made a residential penthouse instead of office.
 
This is starting to really come together and look great. I was driving out of downtown on memorial one morning and saw this on the riverbanks and it looked spectacular. Really completes the East Village look from that side.
 
Beltline_B said:
I really like the way this interfaces the river pathway, I wish we had more of this in places like Eau Claire.
Click to expand...
I think the differences in design shows how much mindsets (of developers, administrators and the public) have changed since 1980s Eau Claire and 2019 East Village. In the 1980s, a quasi-urban/suburban mall in the city centre was the hot idea. You see this with Eau Claire being set far back from the river and all the gated townhomes that could be plopped from anywhere, without a nod to the fact the river is right there. None of 1980s-era Eau Claire elevated the pathway beyond a nice thing to have but not worth changing designs over. The attractive qualities of the location never referenced the pathway system. To be fair to the folks before us, it would have been hard for developers and the public to make the call and focus development on the pathway too much: the pathway system wasn't nearly as complete as it is today nor ingrained in Calgary's psyche. INner city lifestyle wasn't much of a thing with declining population and auto-centric everything being in vogue. Much of the eastern section of the pathway (e.g. where M2 and East Village is) only came together in the late 1970s not to mention countless network/park quality improvements all over the place.

Fast forward to today. The river pathway has become the inner city's most consistently successful attraction to the point it is influencing the design, commuting patterns and social life of citizens. A whole generation of Calgarians grew up with an always-improving pathway network since 1980s Eau Claire, reinforcing the network in the collective conscious as part of life in the City. The urban population is booming and the Instagram-friendly Bow River is centre stage to many Calgarians.

I always thought the river pathway doesn't get enough credit for it's role in the city's evolution. It's helped immeasurable to create a more connected, pedestrian-focused and urban place. Despite all our auto-centric growth and missing connections - something that gets repeated attention in media etc. - the backbone of a high-quality, mostly grade-separated and highly connected river pathways system is one of Calgary's most important urban assets. I am glad developers are recognizing this with more intentional design choices like M2. I expect much more similar development to come in future years as well as with the recent and significant park/pathway bylaw changes being proposed.
 
Me too. I don't think many people realize how much the river pathway has changed the feel of downtown/inner city Calgary in recent years. It's still not too late to add in some retail/resto action along the pathway in Eau Claire, if the willpower is there.... granted not many location available, but it can be done. Where Concord is now would have been the ultimate place for it, especially with the massively popular Peace Bridge. If the second phase of Concord doesn't get built, maybe it can be bought and re-purposed into mixed use?

CBBarnett said:
I always thought the river pathway doesn't get enough credit for it's role in the city's evolution. It's helped immeasurable to create a more connected, pedestrian-focused and urban place. Despite all our auto-centric growth and missing connections - something that gets repeated attention in media etc. - the backbone of a high-quality, mostly grade-separated and highly connected river pathways system is one of Calgary's most important urban assets. I am glad developers are recognizing this with more intentional design choices like M2. I expect much more similar development to come in future years as well as with the recent and significant park/pathway bylaw changes being proposed.
Click to expand...
 
I agree. One of the nice trade-offs of Calgary not having much 19th century architecture or pedestrian-centred neighborhoods, is that we also didn't get much industrialization of our riverfront. Almost every other urban river in North America is basically a concrete trench filled with murky, polluted water that supports almost no life.
 
Silence&Motion said:
I agree. One of the nice trade-offs of Calgary not having much 19th century architecture or pedestrian-centred neighborhoods, is that we also didn't get much industrialization of our riverfront. Almost every other urban river in North America is basically a concrete trench filled with murky, polluted water that supports almost no life.
Click to expand...
To think that decades ago, there was serious discussion about re-routing the rail lines from inner city/downtown to along the river to connect with the portion that already does run along the river, west of the city.? Thank goodness that did not happen.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top