darwink
Senior Member
It is more if the point of opposition is “that is more of a 2050 kind of idea”, it is a counter.
The main things for Alberta is that comparatively, the line is more affordable (easier to build rail on prairie than shield), and speed is what unlocks revenue, which is what makes it worthwhile (a slower line would require a much larger subsidy).
The main things for Alberta is that comparatively, the line is more affordable (easier to build rail on prairie than shield), and speed is what unlocks revenue, which is what makes it worthwhile (a slower line would require a much larger subsidy).