gsunnyg
Senior Member
They need to consider cutting that stupid roof shape, seriously. I can't imagine how ugly these developments will look when there are 2 roof angles in one direction and another in the opposite.
Yes, I wish they would have gone with a different roof shape for the 3rd tower, or even if they'd just made a flat roof for it. It's going to look very odd.They need to consider cutting that stupid roof shape, seriously. I can't imagine how ugly these developments will look when there are 2 roof angles in one direction and another in the opposite.
Or build a 4th tower on the remainder of the block to balance out the appearance.Yes, I wish they would have gone with a different roof shape for the 3rd tower, or even if they'd just made a flat roof for it. It's going to look very odd.
I actually quite like the look of the twins on the skyline, even if they are very Dubai-esque. I wouldn't want all our residential towers to be that tacky but they nicely differentiate themselves from all our other tall residential buildings (although I think the 3rd tower will wreck the balance). The podium, of course, is another story...The crown designs are Dubai kitsch. The designs would have been more forgivable filled with trees instead of spandrel. I'm still surprised Cidex went forward with these instead of more efficient boxes. In that case, I can't decide if these value engineered Dubai kitsch towers that stand out in every way are the better choice than some standard boxes on a commonplace retail podium.
I'm curious if Cidex will start another tower which includes this one. Demand is there. The national funds are becoming more antsy over expanding rental portfolios.