BASE
Active Member
Looks like Bay Area Rapid Transit is happy with their fare gates in terms of fare collection and significantly reduced maintenance required from vandalism.
Everyone keeps voting against it lolCurrently riding the REM in MTL. Edmonton very badly needs fare gates. What a great experience here compared to some days on the ETS LRT.
The bleeding hearts wanting a service (business) to act as a homeless shelter are dragging us all down. Needs of the many must outweigh the needs of the few.Everyone keeps voting against it lol
I was under the impression that a study had been done and it was found to be unfeasible and unlikely to accomplish what it had set out to do, not based on ideological reasons. THB, I found that surprising.The bleeding hearts wanting a service (business) to act as a homeless shelter are dragging us all down. Needs of the many must outweigh the needs of the few.
This is not an anti shelter post at all. (I actively work on transit in Edmonton, I want the best for customers/riders).
I saw someone on Reddit say that Seattle got similar results with increased security, but I'm unsure by how much.I was under the impression that a study had been done and it was found to be unfeasible and unlikely to accomplish what it had set out to do, not based on ideological reasons. THB, I found that surprising.
I used to be one of those bleeding hearts but then moved downtown pre-covid, which pretty much stanched the bleeding. Shelters are shelters; transit is transit. And, as an ongoing and endless response to my performatively woke friends, booting people out and arresting them for open drug use and being general assholes is NOT criminalizing poverty; it's criminalizing criminal behaviours. But yeah, I'm aware I'm pretty much preaching to the choir here.
Seattle isn't a place I want Edmonton to emulate at all.I saw someone on Reddit say that Seattle got similar results with increased security, but I'm unsure by how much.
Still doesn't solve the issue of transit entrances being the sketchy areas with bad sightlines in downtown tbh.
How do they keep people from loitering in the entranceways? Or does their fare zone go right to the exterior doors?Montreal does it and it works. Similar climate too.
I think they'll just trespass people on the REM. The subway entrances in the central areas are all pretty well integrated into the underground city or institutions. Basically foot traffic and security is the answer to your question.How do they keep people from loitering in the entranceways? Or does their fare zone go right to the exterior doors?
The stubborn refusal to deal with this by those who could improve the situation, is partly why things are bad here and why we continue to get stuff like this.Everyone keeps voting against it lol
I've said it before - I think this is a low budget CBC suburban hit piece. Still, the problem with ETS need to be aggressively dealt with.Tell people and they will say Calgary is just as bad! It’s not Calgary has done a much better job of keeping its downtown safe and even in a potentially dangerous area near the shelter in east village. We have become a joke of a city with the way downtown has been handled.
To be clear, people do loiter in the entranceways in Montreal, but they're harmless. I saw the same woman panhandling at my local metro station for years, but I never saw open drug use.How do they keep people from loitering in the entranceways? Or does their fare zone go right to the exterior doors?
The downtown station concourses need to be redesigned to convince me it’s worth the money to install fare gates. Consolidate all the small entrances to a station into one grand ingress/egress with good lighting and sight lines that funnels everyone towards the fare gates. Then we’re talking.but fare gates would make a huge difference, especially now with ARC and tap-to-pay here. Also, come on ETS, get with the times!




