News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.7K     0 

What do you think of this project?

  • I dislike it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I dislike it a lot

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    14
Pulled from the PDF:
1680104765552.png

1680104827636.png

1680104926343.png

1680104952951.png


1680104874772.png

1680104999707.png




1680105028902.png

1680105094444.png


Looks nice overall imo!
 
It is acceptable for me. If they could improve upon the color choices, it would refined it more. It doesn't appear too cohesive with each other at present. I'll reserve my position awaiting further illustrations...
 
I think it is nice and a good spot to fill in. I agree about the colour choices - these days some go a bit over board with it.

The blue part is not needed and clashes with the rest of it. Just leave it out and it would be much better. Sometimes less is more.
 
I don't mind the colour, that part of Jasper could use some colour among all of the grey/beige/brown
 
April 4, 2023 EDC Minutes:

C.1 Centurion 118 Oliver Edwards- Next Architecture
Motion of Support: D. Brown Seconded: A. Zepp
The Committee supports this proposal but notes the following items could benefit from further refinement:
● Consider enhancing the rooftop public amenity areas through the addition of landscape plantings
● CPTED and street connectivity concerns with the “walled garden” approach and high plantings in the front planters, patio and amenity spaces. Patio additions (e.g., low screens, gates, enhanced surface treatments) should also be considered as part of refinement.
● Continue to work with administration regarding the public art contribution.
● Consider variation in colour for exterior cladding material on the east and north facades.
For the Motion: A. Zepp, A. Benoit, D. Brown, J. Candlish, M. Tindall, N. LaMontagne, T. Ziola, J. Mills
CARRIED
 

Back
Top