DSC
Superstar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protected lanes are exactly what's needed all the way down Yonge. The new lanes starting around St. Clair are a good start, which will hopefully be built to a more permanent standard in the future and extended to North York. As experience all over the world shows, interconnected networks of separated bike lanes and protected intersections have a big impact on how people can get around. Toronto is only now starting to build protected intersections so we still have a long way to go.Would many be cycling downtown from above the 401? Unless Yonge St. has protected lanes all the way down it would be too dangerous for my liking.
I'm one of those people. North York Centre is going to be much better for biking in the next several years but it's still highly disconnected from much of the city. The 401 and Hogg's Hollow are like a no man's land for bikes. I'd love to be able to bike to, say, a bakery at Yonge and Lawrence for example more easily. It's a trip that's not really worth it by subway with the TTC's stupid fare system but would be pretty easy by bike (especially an e-bike) if we had proper infrastructure.I agree that few people would commute by bike from north of 401 to downtown but I suspect there are quite a few who live north of 401 who would cycle to Eglinton & Yonge area. Bike tracks are like transit routes, not everybody (in fact very few) take a trip on the whole route. That said, Yonge DOES need lanes 'all the way' - even if not many will use all of them all the time.
Until the battery power is used up or needs replacement.The hill at Hogg's Hollow will become less of an issue as e-bikes get more popular. They make riding uphill feasible for those who don't want to turn an errand or commute by bike into a workout.
Protected lanes are exactly what's needed all the way down Yonge. The new lanes starting around St. Clair are a good start, which will hopefully be built to a more permanent standard in the future and extended to North York. As experience all over the world shows, interconnected networks of separated bike lanes and protected intersections have a big impact on how people can get around. Toronto is only now starting to build protected intersections so we still have a long way to go.
I'm one of those people. North York Centre is going to be much better for biking in the next several years but it's still highly disconnected from much of the city. The 401 and Hogg's Hollow are like a no man's land for bikes. I'd love to be able to bike to, say, a bakery at Yonge and Lawrence for example more easily. It's a trip that's not really worth it by subway with the TTC's stupid fare system but would be pretty easy by bike (especially an e-bike) if we had proper infrastructure.
Would many be cycling downtown from above the 401? Unless Yonge St. has protected lanes all the way down it would be too dangerous for my liking.
By the same token, the presence of a big hill shouldn't stop is from connecting neighbourhoods with quality cycling infrastructure.Introduction of ebikes should not be an excuse to execute bad cycling infrastructure. Excessive grades should be avoided.
If downhill both ways.By the same token, the presence of a big hill shouldn't stop is from connecting neighbourhoods with quality cycling infrastructure.
The Yonge Street issue (on the road itself) needs to be addressed either way, for the benefit of pedestrians accessing local homes/condos/businesses/TTC etc.
That said, I understand the notion that the grade for cycling through traffic from north of 401 to south of Hog's Hollow (or the reverse) is very arduous and a plan that mitigates that is also useful.
I'm not certain, what the N-S demand models show, in terms of prioritizing that additional investment vs say a safe crossing of Bathurst or Bayview, or an added crossing at the southern extent of Willowdale Avenue.
Eventually they should all get done, of course, but time and money being finite, some level of prioritization is required.
The 401 bridge across Hogg's Hollow around Yonge Street is, by some estimations I've seen, the busiest highway bridge for commercial traffic in North America these days. I'd always imagined the bridge dated to the early 50s when the 401 was constructed through what was then York County. But in the 1947 shot of the area, I was surprised to find that the bridge (at least one of the central spans) actually started out as a connector for Avenue Road (and Yonge Blvd.) and Yonge Street! There was a need for it at the time, since York Mills Road and Wilson Avenue didn't meet... which you can see at the bottom; Wilson didn't even come down the hill to meet Yonge. I think it's fascinating the see the familiar bend of the 401 over the West Don appearing in images before there even was a 401.
I asked this question a few months ago and think it remains unanswered.
Does anyone know when work will be starting on the Lower Don Trail from Lake Shore to Pottery Road (?) I know the lower end is closing on 30 November due to the Lake Shore East project (it actually closed in late December) but I see no signs of work being started further up river and I thought all was supposed to be done between September and April. That section of the trail certainly needs work but it will be too bad if it stretches too far into the 2022 'season' - though the on-street Bayview route is a pretty good alternative.
Thanks but as no work appears to have started the hoped for summer 2022 reopening is clearly not happening. Which website did that shot come from?
Thanks but as no work appears to have started the hoped for summer 2022 reopening is clearly not happening. Which website did that shot come from?