taal
Senior Member
I suspect at this point they'll need to justify the cost or drop it so hoping we'll hear more details soon - it does seem ridiculous at first glance
|
|
|
Well they've closed the current trail at Dundas and Sterling for a while now so I guess we won't have the new addition or access to the existing trail (even though they were supposed to be starting construction shortly)Great - watch it get indefinitely deferred now in classic Toronto style.
Deferred for a decade, and then it will cost even moreGreat - watch it get indefinitely deferred now in classic Toronto style. We can file it next to the John Street "revitalization" that will happen any day now, we promise!
Deferred for a decade, and then it will cost even more
Yes, but will it?Deferral is not the answer, holding Mx to account and getting the price charged to the City here reduced by at least 1/2 if not 2/3 is what needs to happen.
Is it possible Metrolinx is billing the City for land acquisition, in the sense that they are handing this over to them when, even if only theoretically, they could use it for anything?
Is it possible Metrolinx is billing the City for land acquisition, in the sense that they are handing this over to them when, even if only theoretically, they could use it for anything?
Drop it. Take that $150 million and build curb separated bike lanes across the city. Focus on saving cyclist lives while in traffic.I suspect at this point they'll need to justify the cost or drop it so hoping we'll hear more details soon - it does seem ridiculous at first glance
True. But we could ask the Feds to redirect their contribution to overall cyclist safety, as I propose.^ you may not have all of that 150 million dollars to spend. Apparently 15% is coming from the federal government and so that proposal may not fit within their program parameters.