Makes sense from a political perspective - after campaigning on SUBWAYS SUBWAYS SUBWAYS, how could he betray his supporters in Scarborough with above ground rail?!
Everyone thinks Ford came up with a great plan that was taken down by the 'left', but it was really just him shooting his own left foot.
$2 billion would've been half of the projected cost for the Sheppard extension at the time (it was actually higher), but with half taken care of, raising the rest would've probably been a lot easier.
I wouldn't say everyone thinks Ford came up with a great plan? What he did was stop another other ideological poorly connected, poorly detailed plan. For the most part voters in these areas of greater impact were in agreement when it was finally called out for various reasons:
Transfers - SLRT, Sheppard, DRL north and even Eglinton East (SMLRT) was not a thru line at Kennedy and thankfully will be now. These were all unnecessary and inconvenient in the location proposed.
Loss on lanes - removal of two lanes on Eglinton and Kingston is still not well received and absolutely doesn't help solve the main problem of alleviating traffic in any way. But with a better connections to the core with Smarttrack and the subway and a seamless Eglinton East it makes it easier to accept.
Poor connectivity of Scarborough Centre - This does have an big impact on attractiveness, optics, and would continue to hinder growth for the future of a proposed Toronto Growth node. Vaughan Centre & North York Centre connected seamlessly. Not a good look
I strongly agree the BDL extension to SCC never needed to be underground and the subway should have made use of the RT corridor from the start moreso once the geological challenges were known. But Smarttrack was the political wedge spliced between
two polarizing ideologies and while the current plan isn't the most economical, its still a very good and well connected long term plan which serves multiple purposes. Furthermore going backward truly wont save much money if any as the absurd transfers are dead and it delaying will further politicize transit when the Feds are finally coming to the table. We don't need that for the sake of all projects future. As far as Transit City was a one trick pony with great coverage for "priority areas", but was a very poorly connected Band-Aid that left the door open to be called out. It was. If some Politicians still want to stick their heels in and refuse to work towards making changes to the old plan than what can you do? Better to move on and start building.