occidentalcapital
Senior Member
Vancouver has basically become a gated city, with highly intense poverty in areas, and tens of thousands of people leaving. It doesn't seem like a model anymore.
|
|
|
Vancouver has basically become a gated city, with highly intense poverty in areas, and tens of thousands of people leaving. It doesn't seem like a model anymore.
In terms of transportation, a better model for me would be Montreal.I think it can still be a model in urban design and transportation planning, but the rest of it we can do without.
In terms of transportation, a better model for me would be Montreal.
Your point is valid. But for me in my opinion Edmonton should aim higher and use Montreal as a model because it's the superior transportation system in the countryOk, and? I never said Vancouver was the best model, just a model. But yes, Montreal is a better model. My point still stands.
Nice place to visit, but for so many/most - couldn't afford to live there. So it is a failure in that regard.Vancouver has basically become a gated city, with highly intense poverty in areas, and tens of thousands of people leaving. It doesn't seem like a model anymore.
I don't totally get what are sometimes directly or indirectly negative comparisons with elsewhere. I know that the grass can seem greener elsewhere and a person doesn't always see all the local problems if are visiting.
I'm not sure if it is meant to shame us into improving, but as far as I can tell the suburban mentality here is fairly resistant or impervious to that. Also, Edmonton isn't going to ever be Vancouver because of significant difference in size, climate and geography. So in my opinion, if you're really pining for Vancouver and think its great, go there, if you can afford it. Otherwise focus on making here better.
I don't know if reading livability and Vancouver in the same sentence makes me wanna laugh or puke. Affordability (and not just real estate/rentals) is a key piece of livability, and Vancouver is the LEAST affordable place in Canada, by any measure you look at.I enjoy Vancouver a lot, have lived there before, visit regularly as my dad lives there and many have regarded it as THE 'poster boy' for urban form, design and lifestyle/livability for two + decades.
Agreed.I can say the same thing about Calgary. There's least 2 or 3 SRC posters who obsess over that city. If you have somehow been operating under the delusion that Calgary is a marvelous utopia and the centre of the universe then just pack up and move there already. Otherwise, let's focus on making Edmonton greater than it is already, warts and all.
Incredibly desirable seems a little bit of an overstatement. I can think of at least a dozen cities in English North America that are more desirable, in pretty much all aspects.It's an incredibly desirable place to live, learn, work and play. That said, it's become out of range for many for a variety of reasons, but continues to be a top destination or desire for many Canadians and internationals.
I'm less impressed by Vancouver the more I've gone to other coastal cities. Yes, it is definitely in an enviable location, but it's buildings, residential for instance, are kind of monotonous to me.
Oslo, where I visited recently, has a similar population and density I believe, and there is so much more diversity and style in the design and architecture. Great vibe. Here's some examples:
View attachment 514776View attachment 514777View attachment 514778View attachment 514779View attachment 514780View attachment 514781View attachment 514782View attachment 514783View attachment 514784View attachment 514785View attachment 514786View attachment 514787View attachment 514788View attachment 514789View attachment 514790