|
|
|
They're large Vehicles running on rubber tyres, guided with a guide rail. I fail to see the difference between it and the O-Bahn:No, because they're not buses.
O-Bahn Busway = O-BahnThey're large Vehicles running on rubber tyres, guided with a guide rail. I fail to see the difference between it and the O-Bahn:
O-Bahn Busway = O-Bahn
The critical difference is that buses can exit the O-Bahn and run on normal city streets, while the rubber tyred metros can't. They don't even have steering wheels.They're large Vehicles running on rubber tyres, guided with a guide rail. I fail to see the difference between it and the O-Bahn:
The critical difference is that buses can exit the O-Bahn and run on normal city streets, while the rubber tyred metros can't. They don't even have steering wheels.
Think of a car on one of those guiderails in a car wash vs. a streetcar.
why are SUVs not the same priority as single-occupant autos, rather than personal trucksHowever, to be labelled "rapid" transit, the city of Toronto has to over-ride the current priorities of its Transportation Department that currently gives priority #1 to the single-occupnt automobile over the 135–275 capacity, depending on configuration, on board a single uncoupled Flexity Freedom light rail vehicle. Until then, any of its vehicles on any kind of right-of-way (whether bus or rail) will be dependant on permission to move by the single-occupant motor vehicles.
Should be…
#1 priority—emergency vehicles#2 priority—pedestrians#3 priority—public transit#4 priority—cycling & e-bikes#5 priority—delivery & contractor trucks#6 priority—autos with more than one person (including taxis & auto sharing)#7 priority—single-occupant autos#8 priority—personal trucks or SUVs
why are SUVs not the same priority as single-occupant autos, rather than personal trucks
Waste of gas, designed for rural use, chunky and takes up more space and higher hp meaning more likely to kill someone in a collisionwhy are SUVs not the same priority as single-occupant autos, rather than personal trucks
Fast? The staff report says bus lanes would be faster than an LRT here. Not to mention the $$ the city will save.This would cover so much of Scarborough with reliable fast rapid transit.
I live around Kingston n Morningside, work downtown, and like to play bingo in the evenings at warden n Eglinton after work. I'd be able to make those 4 trips daily and be in a LRT or
Train for like 95% of trip. Just walking to n from the stations.
Clearly he has never visited NYC and tried to navigate between the different lines at Times Square.Anyone here remember Tory visiting Kennedy Station that one time in his life and saying the connection between BD and SRT was brutal? Yet here we are proposing an LRT with an even worse connection…
This video should be treated like a comedy routine, because christ this video is bad if viewed unironically.