CplKlinger
Senior Member
This article seems like a good, nuanced analysis.Anyone know the source of the 3:1 return on investment remark? Would be interested in reading that given the heavy subsidization of transit.
|
|
|
This article seems like a good, nuanced analysis.Anyone know the source of the 3:1 return on investment remark? Would be interested in reading that given the heavy subsidization of transit.
Is that Market Street?View attachment 390794
Stumbled across this on Twitter and can't help but think Edmonton could use this treatment on several streets.
109 St South of Saskatchewan Drive to 62Ave comes to mind as a major bus transit corridor that could benefit from the efficiency of a median BRT and a nice street redesign.
View attachment 390794
Stumbled across this on Twitter and can't help but think Edmonton could use this treatment on several streets.
109 St South of Saskatchewan Drive to 62Ave comes to mind as a major bus transit corridor that could benefit from the efficiency of a median BRT and a nice street redesign.
It wouldn't be hard to convert, over time, being 100% at grade and on a median alignment, if we went the tram/light rail route.I would rather have rail.
Interesting that staff is raising the idea of fare gates at some stations for council's consideration as one of the solutions.Here's the interim update on transit safety and security coming to council on May 24.