News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 6.7K     0 
Even further down the line, there's the Urban Planning Committee in May when the BRT plan is supposed to be unveiled.

The B1 route (Century Park - Downtown - Castle Downs) has significant overlaps with the Airport-Downtown service, so the two have to be considered in tandem.
 
The_Cat said:
edmontonjournal.com

Opinion: After taking the LRT, it's no wonder many Edmontonians don't use it

Edmonton's LRT system needs to get with the times
edmontonjournal.com edmontonjournal.com
Click to expand...
First of all, unfortunately its not a user friendly or focused system and it shows. I don't know if its the culture of ETS, whether they are oblivious to this or don't care, I'm not sure.

In any event, a lot of it is little things related to signage, placement of things and a number can be fixed relatively easily, if the will exists to do so. It could improve the user experience a lot.

I suspect the system is designed for regular users who sometimes painfully figure things out and are persistent, but if someone is new to using it or not a regular user this can be very off putting.

Making the user experience less painful is probably one the easiest ways to increase the number of users.
 
So we're going to let an Edmonton Journal article, about an experience during non peak hours, allow to set the narrative about the LRT as a whole? Greaaaaat. :) I'm sorry but while this isn't as bad as that "Letter to the Editor" stupidity from someone from Sherwood Park complaining about the Valley Line, I still have an issue with it.

Are there issues we need to address? Yes. Can we do a better job? Absolutely, I've voiced my concerns of little security presence at some of the stations multiple times here. But for once can we get an Opinion article from more frequent transit users? I've already seen enough idiocy on Twitter with people claiming nobody takes the train as a result of this, with wildly inaccurate ridership numbers being thrown around.
 
Kosy123 said:
So we're going to let an Edmonton Journal article, about an experience during non peak hours, allow to set the narrative about the LRT as a whole? Greaaaaat. :) I'm sorry but while this isn't as bad as that "Letter to the Editor" stupidity from someone from Sherwood Park complaining about the Valley Line, I still have an issue with it.

Are there issues we need to address? Yes. Can we do a better job? Absolutely, I've voiced my concerns of little security presence at some of the stations multiple times here. But for once can we get an Opinion article from more frequent transit users? I've already seen enough idiocy on Twitter with people claiming nobody takes the train as a result of this, with wildly inaccurate ridership numbers being thrown around.
Click to expand...
Based on Edmonton’s current situation, I think we should keep listening to this. We have lots to improve. And many people won’t become regular users, but if we can help make the train the preferred option for events, games, and trips downtown, that’d be great.

We don’t just need commuters. We need the casual riders too since our downtown workforce is small relatively. A system that’s not intuitive for new users won’t succeed.

It’s like then opening day of the valley line when I went to 102st stop and found 1 machine broken, 1 shelter broken, and one of our arc cards didn’t tap right. ON OPENING DAY.

It’s honestly a quality assurance, will power, and competency issue at this point. We don’t have the right leaders in place.
 
And Council called for a review of the proposed public spaces bylaw. Why are they so offended when this bylaw might affect vulnerable people?
 
The_Cat said:
And Council called for a review of the proposed public spaces bylaw. Why are they so offended when this bylaw might affect vulnerable people?
Click to expand...
Why does this bylaw go off on weird tangents like potentially restricting people's ability to protest, rather than just address the stated concerns?
 
I took [915 Jasper Place] from WEM TC at 9:16pm tonight. Been a while since I took that trip.

We departed the TC with over 20 people on board. Another 5 or so got on throughout the route, I got off at 172St / 95 Ave, stop 5167.

Bus also has an automatic passenger counter.

IMG_6066.png

Lucky that ETS maintained 30 min Saturday (& Sunday) early evening service along 182St that the old 14 had with the redesign.

[907 Terra Losa] [907 Westmount] I usually take at 9:02pm on Saturday can be lonely, but short ride.
 
trevorhayden said:
Because city manager is closet fascist sympathiser aka UCP plant.
Click to expand...
Council gave the direction to find hundreds of millions in savings. It shouldn't be a surprise that means tough bargaining positions with the unions, cutting social spending, tough rules for public places (it costs a lot of money when people protest, litter, etc). Council has to look in the mirror. It's too easy to blame administration when council has ultimate say and direction.
 
This council, more so than most past ones, does not seem to take its leadership role very seriously (or maybe they actually have no idea what to do) and constantly defers to the administration.

There needs to be more critical discussion and review before hand, so what reaches council is of a better quality. The current council seems unable to do this with its hands off approach.

I am not sure what the point of even having elected officials is, if they continue take this approach.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top