Rusty
New Member
Now THAT'S a hydrant!
|
|
|
How sad that a beautiful beaux arts building was torn down to make way for the identikit midcentury mediocrity that survives to this day.The "new" Post Office on Adelaide Street under construction in 1873. One can see right through the ground floor. Notman & Fraser, in the TPL:
View attachment 123544
How sad that a beautiful beaux arts building was torn down to make way for the identikit midcentury mediocrity that survives to this day.
Beaux-Arts architecture and Second Empire are not necessarily mutually exclusive:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaux-Arts_architecture
How sad that a beautiful beaux arts building was torn down to make way for the identikit midcentury mediocrity that survives to this day.
The "new" Post Office on Adelaide Street under construction in 1873. One can see right through the ground floor. Notman & Fraser, in the TPL:
View attachment 123544
IMHO, I don't think there is anything mediocre about Shore & Moffat's William Lyon Mackenzie Building, at least as it was when the feds owned it. I'm still fond of the building, despite the loss of the open courtyard and the other 2000-ish renos.
But, yes, I agree that William Lyon Mackenzie Building could have been built elsewhere, it never served as a decent view terminus for Toronto Street, and the General Post office building ought to have been saved.
It’s all about timing. The PO could have been integrated into the WLM Building block with very little loss of GFA. It was the Modernist mentality of the era that viewed the compositional purity of the Shore & Moffatt design as more important than the retention of an old building whose design attributes would not be appreciated until the 1980’s. Similar to the demolition of the deco Bank of Montreal at King & Bay for the podium of FCP in the mid-70’s, which while it resulted in a loss of GFA (and revenue), still had to go in the name of the Edward Durrell Stone vision for the corner.
It’s all about timing. The PO could have been integrated into the WLM Building block with very little loss of GFA. It was the Modernist mentality of the era that viewed the compositional purity of the Shore & Moffatt design as more important than the retention of an old building whose design attributes would not be appreciated until the 1980’s. Similar to the demolition of the deco Bank of Montreal at King & Bay for the podium of FCP in the mid-70’s, which while it resulted in a loss of GFA (and revenue), still had to go in the name of the Edward Durrell Stone vision for the corner.