News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

^

not to say that erin o'toole was the right person to lead the conservative party - and certainly based on today's actions by the party's elected mp's the party no longer felt he was the right person - but if the conservative party can't find its way back to embracing the "progressive" elements that were once a proud equal mainstay of the party, they will leave themselves resigned to fighting it out with bernier's ppc to represent the country's right-wing populist fringe elements and never again form government. and from my perspective both the party and the country will be the worse for their making that choice.
 
^

not to say that erin o'toole was the right person to lead the conservative party - and certainly based on today's actions by the party's elected mp's the party no longer felt he was the right person - but if the conservative party can't find its way back to embracing the "progressive" elements that were once a proud equal mainstay of the party, they will leave themselves resigned to fighting it out with bernier's ppc to represent the country's right-wing populist fringe elements and never again form government. and from my perspective both the party and the country will be the worse for their making that choice.
Although I am a registered Liberal, I believe having a CPC that is balanced and closer to the centre, instead of holding hands with the PPC, is important for democracy. One-party systems rarely turn out for the best, even if intentions are good initially, and I hope that the CPC can come out of this closer to the Progressive Conservatives than to the PPC.
 
Liberal and NDP commit to maintain the at least the current number (and an undefined constant number ensuring over representation) of seats for Quebec in the Houae of Commons despite the requirement to reduce it by one according to the Electoral Commission … meaning Quebec residents will have a preferred status in Canada while residents in all other Provinces and Territorys will have proportionally less representation and our votes are worth less. The language used is this “We commit to ensuring that Quebec’s number of seats in the House of Commons remains constant”. The last line in the webpage before asking for donations. Screw the Liberals and NDP for not ensuring equitable representation based on population. https://www.ndp.ca/news/delivering-canadians-now
 
Liberal and NDP commit to maintain the at least the current number (and an undefined constant number ensuring over representation) of seats for Quebec in the House of Commons despite the requirement to reduce it by one according to the Electoral Commission … meaning Quebec residents will have a preferred status in Canada while residents in all other Provinces and Territorys will have proportionally less representation and our votes are worth less. The language used is this “We commit to ensuring that Quebec’s number of seats in the House of Commons remains constant”. The last line in the webpage before asking for donations. Screw the Liberals and NDP for not ensuring equitable representation based on population.
 
Liberal and NDP commit to maintain the at least the current number (and an undefined constant number ensuring over representation) of seats for Quebec in the House of Commons despite the requirement to reduce it by one according to the Electoral Commission … meaning Quebec residents will have a preferred status in Canada while residents in all other Provinces and Territorys will have proportionally less representation and our votes are worth less. The language used is this “We commit to ensuring that Quebec’s number of seats in the House of Commons remains constant”. The last line in the webpage before asking for donations. Screw the Liberals and NDP for not ensuring equitable representation based on population.
I posted in the Alberta politics thread, but this is more appropriate here.
This is a little simplistic, as the whole representativeness in Parliament is a complicated subject. The Maritimes AND the Territories, as a whole, for example, are over represented. If you are concerned with provinces and territories losing representativeness, start there, as this "extra" seat in Quebec is the least of our worries on this front. All in all, this is but another unfolding of the lifelong beef between Alberta and Quebec, that boils down to Oil and pipelines, not fair democratic representation (never was and never will be).

The Westminster System we have in Canada (and the UK) is somewhat detrimental to a fair balance of power, considering the uselessness of the Senate.

Should the Senate be formed by elected officials and the seats distributed in a manner similar to what happens in the US, Brazil and other dual-chamber parliaments, with an equal amount is senators for each province, it would be easier to deal with the political backlash from changing the proportions in the House of Commons.

You say "screw the Liberals and the NDP" for keeping the number of seats in Quebec, but you need to be really naive to believe they would endanger their own votes to benefit the prairie provinces and, indirectly, the CPC. The irony is that the CPC hasn't been great for the Prairies either, as they see us as an automatic win and have been focusing their efforts in making gains in Ontario and Quebec. I'll bet you any kind of money that had the CPC been in power now, the same thing would've happened, as they'd use it to signal Quebecers that they "stand with them" too.

Absolutely NO POLITICAL PARTY will EVER reduce the number is seats of any province at any time in history, because it is political suicide.
They might fight to increase the number of seats where it's convenient for them, but it is really, really naive to believe anyone would ever do what you expect them to, no matter what the projections, laws, bylaws, commissions or whatever say.
 
 
New federal ridings have been proposed for Alberta, which can be found at https://redecoupage-redistribution-2022.ca/com/ab/prop/othaut/rep_e.aspx. They've done a fairly good job of balancing populations of the ridings. This go around, Alberta picks up three new ridings. In Edmonton, ridings that were previously shared with St. Albert and areas south of the city have retreated fully within city limits, giving Edmontonians more representation to account for population gains since 2011.

A few observations relevant to Edmonton, and how I think party standings could be influenced:
-Edmonton-Strathcona has added a bit of territory south of the Whitemud to account for population growth not keeping up with other areas. I feel like the previous riding's population was somewhat temporarily underpopulated, given that the Census these redistributions are based on was in May 2021, when some people had moved to suburban areas for more space, students weren't attending many in-person classes that year due to the pandemic, and there are just fewer of them around in any month of May than September to April. I think some people and students are now moving back to this area for convenience and shorter commutes. There are also quite a few towers and lower-rises being built in the area, as well as being an attractive place for infills. The areas it picks up are probably some of the less Conservative areas of other former ridings, which could make it more difficult for the new ridings to the south of Edmonton-Strathcona to be competitive, while Edmonton-Strathcona is likely to remain an NDP stronghold.
-South Edmonton: now split into 3 ridings in a more north-south orientation, spreading high growth areas among them. This should help prevent rapid electoral unfairness as was seen in the previous Edmonton-Wetaskiwin riding here, which became the most populous riding in the country by far by 2021. Previous Edmonton-Mill Woods' area west of 66 Street is ceded to the new Edmonton-Gateway riding, and it takes in newer growth area in the southeast. The territory ceded has recently been a bit more Conservative-voting than areas east of 66 Street, so this could possibly make this riding more competitive for a non-Conservative to win, but this could depend on the demographics of those moving into the newer areas south of the Henday.
-North Edmonton: Edmonton Centre loses Conservative voting territory south and west of the U of A to pick up the much more urban McCauley/Parkdale area. This makes this riding less Conservative, however it still could be so competitive between the NDP and Liberals that it would remain anyone's game. Edmonton Griesbach loses McCauley/Parkdale and picks up territory in the far north. This could make it tougher for the NDP to retain this seat.
-Surrounding municipalities: The character of most ridings surrounding Edmonton would change to be centred more on the immediate suburbs and less on rural areas. Conservatives will probably still win all of these seats, but the representatives may need to be more moderate Conservatives than is typical of rural areas.

I think this riding design is overall pretty good, but I would suggest that the new Edmonton-Griesbach could be shaped better to contain more of the mature neighbourhoods north of the river and Edmonton-Manning could focus more on newer suburban areas (e.g. put the Belvedere and Bannerman areas in Edmonton-Griesbach and give Edmonton-Manning Lago Lindo), as this would better group communities of interest.

If anyone feels strongly that mistakes are being made or that the ridings could be improved before these are finalized, you can attend public participation sessions on September 12 and 13 in Edmonton where the commission will hear public cases (but you have to notify them by August 15).
Edmonton Metro Ridings.PNG
Edmonton Ridings.PNG
 

Back
Top