kora
Active Member
The DP for Battistella's Nude is in:
https://developmentmap.calgary.ca/#property/DP2018-2882
177 units is what I'm seeing
|
|
|
The DP for Battistella's Nude is in:
https://developmentmap.calgary.ca/#property/DP2018-2882
Looks like Bronconnier is pitching something in Sunalta:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...condos-tenth-avenue-bronconnier-lrt-1.4713847
I think it is this site:
https://developmentmap.calgary.ca/#property/LOC2018-0116
Looks like Bronconnier is pitching something in Sunalta:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...condos-tenth-avenue-bronconnier-lrt-1.4713847
Sure would like to know who the developer is for this. I am sure Bronconnier is just the front man.
TELUS data centre.What is the big ugly building to the south of Bronco's site? looks like a data centre or something...
Bronconnier is his own developer IIRC, he did that little 3 storey commercial building on 17ave and 33st SW. I think he hired Cidex as GC for the construction though, so that's probably what he will do here.
I didn't know Telus had taken that over. I used to work in that building when it was the data centre for Nova (predecessor to Nexen) Was a cool building back in the day.TELUS data centre.
That is pretty substantial. Any other insights into what it looks like / how tall it is?177 units is what I'm seeing
I believe that’s the building SE of Sanulta Station that looks sort of like a storm trooper.TELUS data centre.
Hey guys,
I work for a large multifamily owner. We need to consider what each type of ownership group wants.
1. Large asset holders (typically backed by institutional money): When these guys enter a market either through buying existing product or developing new it's simply because in their view, usually long term, the investment meets their requirements of return. For these guys keeping units empty is a matter of managing market pricing. Although it may cost you a month of vacancy it's worth it to hold onto the unit and maintain your market rents. If you're empty for the next year or two that doesn't bust you, but accepting much less than anticipated in the long term will. For these assets holders the buildings are viewed like any other income generating asset, and in that mindset average rents are more important that current vacancy.
2. Accidental landlords: Usually this includes multifamily developers who don't sellout projects. In most cases (hopefully), when they get down to the last unsold units the actual cost of that unit to them is very low if not nil. For these guys it's a tough decision. You can rent for a period of time and make some cash at the expense of wear and tear or you keep it open as inventory hoping for a sale sooner than later. In my experience these companies are not great landlords, their business is to build, sell and move on. We've seen more of these units enter the rental pool recently as guys are hoping the damage and issues of managing rentals are outweighed by future price appreciation.
3. Small time owners: These are the guys we think of most, and you're right for the most part they cannot afford vacancy and don't really care about managing market rents as long as they are full and have decent tenants. Usually this type of owner has older product and will be more flexible when it comes to rates and lease terms.
In terms of affordability Calgary is fairly affordable however one argument for building new affordable is product mix, not all units are equal and in a lot of cases the new inventory fills holes.
final note - the above comments are based on "the rational manager", there are some terrible managers and great managers who will get much different results from the same assets.
Anyway, I've written too much.
That mall and Marlborough really need to be torn down and revitalized soon. I got great memories from my teenage years but they're both sinking ships that are well past their primes. I think even H and M bailed out of sunridge recently. They're both on the LRT line so it would be awesome for a new high density shopping mall concept instead of the vast empty parking lots with shady people lurking around.Anyone know what's going on at Sunridge Mall? I believe they're putting in a Marks in the top floor of the old Target, but they have the construction area fenced off beyond that, and for the whole parking lot in front of the southern mall entrance.
That mall and Marlborough really need to be torn down and revitalized soon. I got great memories from my teenage years but they're both sinking ships that are well past their primes. I think even H and M bailed out of sunridge recently. They're both on the LRT line so it would be awesome for a new high density shopping mall concept instead of the vast empty parking lots with shady people lurking around.