TossYourJacket
Senior Member
This city is an embarrassment sometimes. They promise so many things and do basically none of them.
|
|
|
Are you suggesting some bike trail express tunnels, such as from South Humber Park avoiding the second hill on Stephen Dr with an outlet at Berry Road, then another tunnel avoiding the third hill on Stephen then popping out again in Kings Mill Park, and finally a tunnel from the base of the hill by the Toronto Humber Yacht Club popping out at its other end beside where Park Lawn Cemetery is atop the hill? Because I am.One problem we have with design of the trails seems to be that they are designed by non-cyclists. As a cyclist, I would like to avoid hills, especially the uphills. The designers don't consider that hills become a barrier for the elderly, kids or novice, or physical challenged (AKA out-of-shape).
Are you suggesting some bike trail express tunnels, such as from South Humber Park avoiding the second hill on Stephen Dr with an outlet at Berry Road, then another tunnel avoiding the third hill on Stephen then popping out again in Kings Mill Park, and finally a tunnel from the base of the hill by the Toronto Humber Yacht Club popping out at its other end beside where Park Lawn Cemetery is atop the hill? Because I am.
42
They need to stop the ban of e-bikes on the trails. Then they become more accessible.
Toronto is a hilly city. Gonna have a hard time avoiding hills.
If it changed to permit pedal-assist bikes, I would be all for it. What I don't want on the multi-use paths are the Daymak DUI scooters.
I don't know how I feel about the bidirectional part. I get why it's there, but I feel like there has to be a better design unless the plan is to continue a bidirectional lane along the rest of College.
I must admit that I have done the same, even to this day.In the 1950's, I rode my bike the wrong way on one-way streets without a problem. We always assumed the "one-way" sign was meant for motor vehicles, not bicycles. Ditto for the "stop" signs.
In the 1950's, I rode my bike the wrong way on one-way streets without a problem. We always assumed the "one-way" sign was meant for motor vehicles, not bicycles. Ditto for the "stop" signs.
I don't know how I feel about the bidirectional part. I get why it's there, but I feel like there has to be a better design unless the plan is to continue a bidirectional lane along the rest of College.
It's not hard for any city to leave Toronto in the dust, when we only managed to install ~3km of bike lanes last year, and are way behind on both the 10-year cycling plan [2016] as well as the less-ambitious sequel to it.Just in case anyone thought that other cities sometimes have slightly more ambitious cycling plans...
That's fine but are we gonna do this at every similar instance? I know of a couple spots elsewhere in the city that this would work for, also. I think consistency is something we lack in Toronto's cycling infrastructure.I like it. If you're confident, you can turn left as a vehicle onto College from Bellevue. Otherwise, take the short bi-directional lane to the lights.