jmacmillan
Active Member
I commute almost every day by bike, and upset at this decision, which has been part of a trend of interference in local affairs by suburban councillors. But I was also never really in favour of the Jarvis bike lanes. I also don't think that those types of protests, that will just inflame motorists further, are productive.
Here's why:
The planning process for Jarvis included multiple consulations that were to humanize the street and bring neighbourhood benefits back. Jarvis was widened in the 1940s/1950s as a throughway for uptown commuters streaming down Mount Pleasant Road. In a 1950s era, this kind of made sense. Jarvis had faded as the grand street it once was, there were no streetcars or many buses on that street (Sherbourne had streetcars until 1947 and buses after that). The neighbourhood bounced back with new developments such as the National Ballet School and Radio City.
But instead of the streetscape improvements and wider sidewalks, cyclists opposition surged and lobbied hard (I remember Hamish Wilson out there, lonely standing outside a consultation trying to get support for bike lanes when they weren't on the table) and got those bike lanes. So paint was appied and the overhead signals removed instead of permanent street improvements that would have been nearly impossible to reverse. Now we're back to square one.
Jarvis made less sense for bike lanes than Church (which could connect to Davenport and go all the way to Front). Now I'm hoping Yonge can be redesigned with bikes in mind along with wider sidewalks and streetscaping, I already don't find Yonge bad cycling down, even in rush hour, and Yonge has a supportive BIA as well. I have hope for Yonge.
I was at both meetings and my impression was entirely different. I was prepared to advocate for bike lanes but was astonished at the number of people, many of whom were residents and professed to cycle only occasionally, speak in favour of the bike lane option. So many in fact, that Kyle Rae, changed his support towards bike lanes, the option city planners rejected. The community wanted bike lanes, not just some vocal cyclists.
City streets should be safe for everyone. I live on Jarvis and will have to be ever vigilant because suburban politicians are willing to risk lives to save 2 minutes for drivers.
Last edited: