News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

It depends on what is being discussed. Some are talking about pax/commuter rail from Pembroke to Ottawa. In that regard, the former CP and CN routes are only proximate at Pembroke. South of that they diverge significantly. At some magic point, trying to knit together a bunch of abandoned (some very long abandoned) rights-of-way becomes greenfielding. Even north/west of Pembroke, the lines diverge.

There are several lines from Arnprior to choose from, but, if it is intact, the one that goes from Arnprior to Renfrew and then to Pembroke would be the best choice from connecting places that should have a station.How intact the ROW and what is needed to ensure it is continuous, I do not know.

In terms of restored through service in the Ottawa Valley, the lack of need or freight service, including military movements, has already been demonstrated by the lines being abandoned. Without freight revenue, they/it would be a passenger route and I defy anybody to demonstrate how it would be financially feasible, even with public money. In all of the GO network, other than double tracking, how much virgin track have they laid? LSE? A doodlebug service between Pembroke and Ottawa hardly compares.

They could try to sell it as a way of bringing good paying jobs. Politicians love those photo ops. This is why a bus service run by the province would be best to start something.

Off topic but CF retention and recruit issues has multiple facets; housing costs in some locations being one. Another is spousal employment. The logic that transportation expansion (rail, road, etc.) and increased housing demand being a path to reduced hosing prices goes against just about everything history has shown.

If I was posted to PET and my wife wanted to work in Ottawa, that would be good for the marriage. Another scenario is people who work at NDHQ could live out there. The CAF could even build PMQs and help relieve the housing shortage.

Taking over private, for-profit bus companies would be a public policy decision. Actually, with deregulation, the government could simply start operating a bus line and just drive them out of business (that'll be good for votes).

I don't think it should surprise anyone that GO/Metrolinx is mandated to serve the GTA/GTHA/GGHA. If some government had proposed to fund a pan-provincial transit authority in 1967 they would have been laughed out of office. As an actual service provided, not just a policy or regulatory body, what should its bounds be? Maybe they should venture into Ottawa (it seems they couldn't do worse than the city) but I'm not sure if a single agency consisting of isolated service pockets is particularly efficient. Given the massive size of Ottawa, how much of the transit in the area is inter-jurisdictional.

Maybe a new agency within the MTO is created for the Ottawa area. Or, GO/Metrolinx's mandate is changed to cover all commuter service within the province. They do have the expertise.
 
This rail bridge in Vancouver caught fire.

Doesn't look like it's really used that much based on the northside aerial and there's still a connection on the east side.

Screenshot_2024-06-21_161455.jpg




 
This rail bridge in Vancouver caught fire.

Doesn't look like it's really used that much based on the northside aerial and there's still a connection on the east side.

View attachment 574443



According to a CPKC comment on the fire, the trestle has been out of service since 2022.
 
This rail bridge in Vancouver caught fire.

Doesn't look like it's really used that much based on the northside aerial and there's still a connection on the east side.

View attachment 574443




More history on the bridge here: https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/marpole-rail-trestle-bridge-part-of-richmond-history
 
I seem to remember reading that you don't pre-clear both customs and immigration in Vancouver (only one, but I can't remember which), and that is why the train still needs to stop at the boarder, just for less time. There were plans to change this, but I don't know if this ever happened.
I don't know about southbound (why wouldn't they just clear at the Vancouver train station?) but northbound, the Amtrak staff does a passport check when you board, and they just submit this to Canada customs. Perhaps if they need to remove someone they stop, but I don't remember my train stopping; if it did it was very brief. The main clearance is at Vancouver station, where you line up, like when you arrive at an airport.
 
I don't know about southbound (why wouldn't they just clear at the Vancouver train station?) but northbound, the Amtrak staff does a passport check when you board, and they just submit this to Canada customs. Perhaps if they need to remove someone they stop, but I don't remember my train stopping; if it did it was very brief. The main clearance is at Vancouver station, where you line up, like when you arrive at an airport.

I was referring to pre-clearance into the USA, not post-travel, arriving into Canada. I can't find an official reference, but according to this post on Quora:
On the Cascades between Vancouver and Seattle/Portland, most border formalities take place at Vancouver's Pacific Central Station. Northbound there is no stop at the border. Canadian Immigration and Customs inspections take place upon arrival at Pacific Central Station. Southbound, US Immigration inspection takes place in Pacific Central Station prior to boarding in a Preclearance-lite. The train stops next to the Peace Arch Border Station in Blaine, WA and US Customs performs its inspection on US soil by walking through the train.

EDIT: Here is an article from The Urbanist in Nov. 2019, which says the same thing. It does indicate that Amtrak was hoping to remove the need to stop, but I suspect that was delayed with COVID.
When departing from Vancouver, passengers receive partial inspections by CBP and Canadian agents at Pacific Central Station. This allows them to then enter a secured area and board the train. Again, without stopping in the Canadian frontier, the train proceeds to the United States. However, the train stops at Peace Arch in Blaine (in the United States) so that armed CBP officers can search the train, again inspect passengers, and then collect their customs declaration forms. This process typically takes about 10 minutes, but requires the train to make a full stop while it is carried out.
 
Last edited:


This proposal, which comes by way of the owners of the Mt. Norquay Ski Resort, is more than a little controversial.

The train pictured actually doesn't have anything to do with what was approved, directly.

The owners of the resort want an aerial gondola from this 1,000 space parking lot, to the foot of their resort. Parks Canada has turned that down multiple times.

Parks Canada has also raised serious issues w/this proposal as it would interfere with a key wildlife corridor.

Although there are vague hints of a multi-mobility hub here, there is nothing firm about anything servicing this location, beyond, presumably, the Rocky Mountaineer.

The discussion of HSR from Calgary to Banff also originates with this same family and is reliant, it would seem not only layers of approval by others, by also funding.

 

Back
Top