Allandale25
Senior Member
^ Thanks. So the 4th track will swing to the right (heading westbound) to get past the upright + bungalow? I assume the separate ground-level signal will be 'vader' style and not 'searchlight' style.
|
|
|
^ Thanks. So the 4th track will swing to the right (heading westbound) to get past the upright + bungalow? I assume the separate ground-level signal will be 'vader' style and not 'searchlight' style.
^ My mind immediately went to this signal and its height. RH line, Bala Sub near River and Bayview.
The latest images of new stations suggest that the south-west 2 Kitchener Line tracks will be for stopping trains, with express / limited stop trains on the north-east 2 tracks.It depends on how they intend to use that new track. I have heard different stories and I'm not sure they have even landed. Seems to depend on things like how the platforms at Liberty will work.
If the track is for local trains that will mostly be stopping anyways, a low mast is OK because visibility is not a concern for most moves. The train will have plenty of time to see the signal while the trains are stopped.
But if that is slotted to be an "express" track, they will want the signal high (as those on the tower already are) so it can be seen from further away over the "clutter" of the platform.
- Paul
What exactly is the supposed lack of communication? Given this individual's fervent (thankfully ineffectual) activism on the matter, they've clearly been well aware of the significant disruptions, and the blocked connection is nothing new.
Having seen her most recent tweet, she seems to want day-by-day visual updates from Metrolinx. What a shock that the agency isn't interested in fanning the flames by pointlessly releasing pictures of the ravine under construction. Of course, if they had released pictures, our friend would simply shift back to criticizing the construction. These groups simply do not operate in good faith.
next week news story:
jimmie simpson park's fence takes 1m more of space from the park than expected during construction
View attachment 511135
Staying on the topic of the post, I wonder if it's a worry at this particular moment the water isn't flowing through and that's part of the implementation plan and if it was always intended to be 'turned on' at completion. I'm certainly not a water expert. I seem to recall that the water already wasn't flowing through and that one of the goals for this project was to fix that.Picture of the state of Small's Creek Ravine as at this week:
View attachment 511117
Photo Credit Alisa Metcalfe
Text from her FB post (which features additional pics)
View attachment 511118
I used to engage with people after posting my opinions, but spending hours and hours debating people with the same arguments is kinda pointless.Not that 1M would necessarily be insignificant (it could be the difference between a viable sports field and none at all); but your association of a hypothetical, and unlikely future complaint that you would choose to dismiss with a real event that has already occurred that is tangible and is not about 1 tree or 1 meter of land is not reasonable.
We all get here that you're a bit of an apologist for the provincial government (on a wide range of projects, in multiple threads); and that you wouldn't care if every tree on earth were chopped down, notwithstanding that it would literally make the planet unlivable. You're allowed your preferences.
But randomly inserting them, again and again in multiple threads when you have no news or insight to share is really inflammatory, and not necessary. You seem to live for taking digs at others with whom you disagree. Its not persuasive, it doesn't change anyone's view and its not a good look. Just sayin.
I think that the comment merely refers to that the flow isn't going through the new culvert - the old one is still there for now, as they aren't overlapping.Staying on the topic of the post, I wonder if it's a worry at this particular moment the water isn't flowing through and that's part of the implementation plan and if it was always intended to be 'turned on' at completion. I'm certainly not a water expert. I seem to recall that the water already wasn't flowing through and that one of the goals for this project was to fix that.
How then do you justify all the trees that had been planned to be removed on the south side, west of the culvert, that weren't actually necessary to complete the project; some 100+ years old?If the only thing stopping infrastructure serving millions of people is a few trees, then it is in the public interest to build the project.
I used to engage with people after posting my opinions, but spending hours and hours debating people with the same arguments is kinda pointless.
for the next part This is on-topic of the trees at smalls creek alongside a GO CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
As for the trees you must have misunderstood me.
To be clear heres my opinion. Save this if you need to. Because I stand by it
If the only thing stopping infrastructure serving millions of people is a few trees, then it is in the public interest to build the project. Now i know theres a big hole in that argument where highways can be built using that argument especially 413 but Im not in favour of highways hell even roads at all. Theres a reason im here and not on cartoronto.com LOL.
Are you sure that everyone is that concerned with climate change? If we are in a place that 100 trees will save the planet, id literally donate to someone to do so. But it isn't is it?
If we refuse to tear down the Gardiner, close highways and encourage more non-car uses. If we refuse to tell the suburbs to stop whining about their commute times. If we refuse to even tell people to take the train to save the environment Then why should I care about killing 5 trees for a transit station? Hell we even complain when transit station construction that don't cut trees increase commute times. This is ridiculous
I dont care about some trees because to me no one wants to change their lifestyle.
You seem very confident in that 20,000 trees number? If youre going to take the high road id recommend providing proofFor clarity, my concern is that your post was entirely a flame-war type move.
There is no added value, no new information, no opinion not previously offered.
Your post seems entirely, solely to have no purpose but to inflame.
Swell, but this isn't about 1 tree or 10 trees; you have collectively across multiple thread said more than 20,000 trees don't matter.
Ontario Line, Ontario Place, GO Construction threads.......
Math matters. Its not one tree, its not 5 trees its 20,000 trees when you add them up.
Its also countless rare and endangered species that grow under those trees that will die-off when the trees are cut.
***
You also have a tendency to make false connections and misreport people's positions.
I don't recall anyone saying don't expand GO Service, or add tracks, the question is how, and with that off-sets for any damage done.
Likewise, No one opposed the Ontario Line in principle, people raised concerns about Osgoode Station, and about the combined track segments on the surface in the east end and the impacts of the Maintenance facility.
None of that is an argument not to build the Ontario Line/DRL, the discussion is over the form and the detail.
You have this propensity, across multiple posts, that anyone who questions any detail of something you support is a mortal enemy and an idiot beyond salvation.
It might serve you well to ask, could they possibly be my fellow project supporter who simply wants to see a better version of the project implemented?
There is room for varied opinion, yours and others; but you have to acknowledge that.
Again, so far, you're in favour of cutting down 20,000 trees, not five, or fifty or five hundred.
You seem to lack an understanding of cumulative effect. You also don't get a number of other nuanced details.
It is possible to disagree respectfully.
But you don't allow for that, you metaphorically spit at people who question anything you support in any way, instead of seeking nuanced compromise.\
I answer your questions even when I'm irritated with you, and I do so fairly and impartially.
Its possible to disagree with someone and still intelligently debate the facts.
That means, meme-free, and only after doing all your homework and reasoning out a thoughtful response to someone rather than name-calling or giving the proverbial finger.
don't recall anyone saying don't expand GO Service, or add tracks, the question is how, and with that off-sets for any damage done.
Likewise, No one opposed the Ontario Line in principle, people raised concerns about Osgoode Station, and about the combined track segments on the surface in the east end and the impacts of the Maintenance facility.