Krypto98
Active Member
It's probably because the current buses are fullNot that helpful for trip planning when the additional bus trips are within 5 mins of the current ones.
|
|
|
It's probably because the current buses are fullNot that helpful for trip planning when the additional bus trips are within 5 mins of the current ones.
This is exactly the case.It's probably because the current buses are full
You think the 31 is confusing, just wait till you see the 21. It's more like a bus network than a bus routeThis might be the first time the "X" branch has ever been used in a route. The 31 has way too many branches and needs to be simplified.
3 double decker loads is only 200 people. 12 car train is like 5000...big difference.3 full busloads on this morning's 9:53 Niagara bus. I don't understand why they won't run trains. It's going to be insane by May 24 weekend.
There is still hidden demand. I will go there If and only if a non-stop bus is printed on the schedule.3 full busloads on this morning's 9:53 Niagara bus. I don't understand why they won't run trains. It's going to be insane by May 24 weekend.
200 people choosing to take a service scheduled for 2h40h including a transfer to a slow bus, may well correspond to 800 people on a direct train scheduled for 2h10. Remember that ridership is also heavily influenced by the quality of service offered, and casual riders have a strong preference for direct trips and for trains rather than buses. The option to conveniently carry a bike aboard also attracts many riders who wouldn't take the indirect bus.3 double decker loads is only 200 people. 12 car train is like 5000...big difference.