timio
Active Member
It's several peak-hour peak-direction buses on weekdays, connecting to trains or buses in Milton, for a total trip time (from Galt) of 2 hours. Why take that when you could drive to Milton?
Or Aldershot/Burlington.
|
|
|
It's several peak-hour peak-direction buses on weekdays, connecting to trains or buses in Milton, for a total trip time (from Galt) of 2 hours. Why take that when you could drive to Milton?
How is this fact based planning?
Here's an example of what the tracks and RoW look like.Too bad there is no way to rip up tracks and replace them.
Oh well!
Cancel all transit plans ever.
Bear in mind the rails of the almost entire length of what's left of that sub are from the Twenties, almost a century old. There's a few sections of heavier rail closer to Guelph from the Forties. That used to be the Great Western Railway main. It's been languishing ever since CNR was formed, and the Grand Trunk was almost always the choice out of the two to keep as the better route.Seeing the pics of the ROWs really makes it sad how we've ignored so many good opportunities to connect these small communities.
Tweet from Ben Spurr: "New transportation minister says she wants to investigate bringing GO train service to her riding, despite low existing ridership and big logistical challenges" article: https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/gt...ain-service-for-her-riding-is-a-priority.html
It's about 20 km southeast from Kitchener GO to Galt station - you are pretty much doubling back. It's only 40 km to Milton GO. Best travel times back in 1950 with steam engines, was 17 minutes from Guelph Junction to Galt, 11 minutes from Guelph Junction to Milton. So 28 minutes - say 30 from Milton to Galt.So why have a branch to Kitchener and one to Cambridge? Why not have the Cambridge stop AFTER the Kitchener stop? Maybe ION Phase 2 would remove the need.
The rush-hour service route 24 they added to Galt a year or so ago to meet the Milton train. Problem is it takes 60 minutes, because it has to go all the way up to the 401, and then back down again, while the train used to do it in 30.Low existing ridership on what?
She's been talking about extending this forever. She'd surely discussed with GO Transit, Wynne, Del Luca before. It's a pretty obvious extension.If McGarry made these statements on her own, I'm afraid her lifetime in the Liberal cabinet will be quite short.
Arguably liberal? Red Tories are arguably liberal.For an arguably liberal newspaper, The Star really likes taking large dumps on any sort of public transit news, whether it's Hume complaining about the Eglinton Crosstown not being aboveground along Central Eglinton, hating on Lawrence East GO station for no apparent reason (with the coming of fare integration and eventual Stouffville express service), complaining about any sort of delay in construction (ie Union Station), or dismissing any sort of commuter option for Cambridge. I'm beginning to wonder what their agenda really is.
PS. Don't get me wrong, their coverage of the UPX arguably drove down the costs of fares, however, their entirely pessimistic outlook only seems to hurt the public's view of public transit.
Seeing the pics of the ROWs really makes it sad how we've ignored so many good opportunities to connect these small communities. If Transport Canada/FRA regulations weren't a requirement, it would've been nice to see something like the Alstom Cordia Lint or Stadler Flirt used on these ROWs instead of the hulking current GO train consists. I purposely didn't mention Metrolinx cause they clearly would not be intelligent enough to figure this out. Not even going to mention Via.
I agree, but many of these 'remote' routes will not be run by GO. They will have to be run by local authorities, and that only after Transport Canada relaxes or updates some regs.Bring back the RDCs! But any DMU should do the trick.
Here's an example of what the tracks and RoW look like.It just doesn't make sense.
Stills:
http://www.niagararails.com/fergus.phtml
Careful you don't trip up on your hyperbole. It's far, far more than just 'replacing' track. The whole RoW needs to be redone.Yep, I guess we can't replace the track!
Pack er in boys, and remember, track is irreplaceable.
So once all mainline and GO tracks start to degrade we are going to have to abandon the concept of rail entirely.
The Barrie Line cancellations are getting ridiculous. Today January 22nd:
Union 10:40 - Aurora 11:29 #GOtrain ends @ Maple due to freight train traffic
Aurora 11:41 - Union 12:33 #GOtrain starts @ Maple due freight traffic
Union 11:40 - Aurora 12:29 #GOtrain ends @ Maple due to freight train traffic
Union 13:40 - Aurora GO 14:29 #GOtrain will end at Maple due to freight train traffic.
There were another 2 or 4 of these a few days ago. I think about 6-10 trains a week are being cancelled.
My immediate thought is that it was instituted in haste as a political ploy, rather than the line being ready for the degree of service scheduled. It has a ring of deja-vu to it, as I just happened to catch two trains going south on there yesterday as I walked the dog from Bloor Station down the West Toronto Railpath, and then east of Lansdowne, as close as can be done zig-zagging the roads immediately to the north of the RoW to King Street.First I 'liked' the post above as thanks for the info; needless to say, I find the info itself dismaying.
Perhaps those in the know about track access rules such as @smallspy and @crs1026 could share why this might be allowed to happen.
To clarify, these are Metrolinx/GOs tracks; while I realize the freights have usage rights...........I would have assumed that they were assigned a window of operation by GO, and further than if they miss their window they would have to wait til they weren't in GO's way.
Clearly my understanding is wrong......
First I 'liked' the post above as thanks for the info; needless to say, I find the info itself dismaying.
Perhaps those in the know about track access rules such as @smallspy and @crs1026 could share why this might be allowed to happen.
To clarify, these are Metrolinx/GOs tracks; while I realize the freights have usage rights...........I would have assumed that they were assigned a window of operation by GO, and further than if they miss their window they would have to wait til they weren't in GO's way.
Clearly my understanding is wrong......