Leo_Chan
Senior Member
This statement answers all the questions I've every had about websites.See how the header and footer blocks span outside of the website? Thats OK, because it doesnt actually contain any site information.
|
|
|
This statement answers all the questions I've every had about websites.See how the header and footer blocks span outside of the website? Thats OK, because it doesnt actually contain any site information.
Sure, but it looks like Metrolinx is using 800.WCAG 2.0 AA has a maximum screen width limit of 1024px.
Its an AODA WCAG 2.0 requirement
Its an AODA WCAG 2.0 requirement
Its an AODA WCAG 2.0 requirement
As someone who builds websites for the government, good design is impossible now. AODA and disability/accessibility take 100% precedence or else they will get sued into oblivion.
Level AA is not "required by the government" in 2018.If a WCAG 2.0 website isn't doing this, it is not level AA, which is required by the government
Level AA is not "required by the government" in 2018.
https://www.ontario.ca/page/how-make-websites-accessible
Spokeswoman Anne Marie Aikins says the train, which was carrying equipment, became stuck sometime before 6 a.m. Wednesday due to a broken switch on the tracks.
Aikins says the issue is west of Malton Station, so the Union Pearson Express — which uses a section of the Kitchener Line — is not affected.
And AMA strikes again....
The train was a service train (which was a deadhead until a couple of weeks ago) that ran a red and came || close to sideswiping a CN freight. The work required to be done to the switches was the fact that the GO train broke some of the point linkages that were lined against it.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
And AMA strikes again....
The train was a service train (which was a deadhead until a couple of weeks ago) that ran a red and came || close to sideswiping a CN freight. The work required to be done to the switches was the fact that the GO train broke some of the point linkages that were lined against it.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
The train was a service train (which was a deadhead until a couple of weeks ago) that ran a red and came || close to sideswiping a CN freight. The work required to be done to the switches was the fact that the GO train broke some of the point linkages that were lined against it.
Sorry just to be clear, the "service train" was a GO train in service that formally deadheaded? So it ran through the switch the opposite way the points were aligned? EDIT/Update: what trip was the in service GO train on?
I am actually surprised at ML being able to get away with such loose characterizations of serious safety related incidents.
If you compare this incident to last year's event where a CP train ran a red signal on the North Toronto Sub, GO is getting away with virtually no press coverage. And, this characterization is far from transparent. Compare it to yesterday's Southwest Airlines event.... there are only 150ish souls on a 737, but there can be a thousand or more on a GO train.
Nothing good happens when the media tries to report this stuff, as the media coverage is generally poor at the technical details and the reporting is usually sensationalised. But at the very least ML ought to be disclosing as part of their annual report and diligence how often in a year this happens. This isn't the first such event of this decade.
- Paul
Also, for the daily log release, is there a link online?