|
|
|
lol...the train only runs every five years...The timeline is probably timed to coincide with each consecutive provincial election.
Even with election talk looming and campaign messages emerging, Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown isn’t ready to commit to continuing a high-speed rail project that would link London to Toronto if his party wins next year.
“I do think (high-speed rail) is valuable, I do think it’s a worthy goal and under this Liberal government it will never happen,” Brown said Tuesday at a campaign-style stop in St. Thomas.
“What I will commit to is making sure that we actually get shovels in the ground, that we spend our infrastructure dollars wisely. . . . What I promise you is that we’ll get better value for infrastructure.”
But the surprise spring announcement is hitting a sour note with Brown, who said the Liberals are only raising the high-speed rail discussion to attract votes.
“They’re using it as a re-election tool, they’re using it as a photo op. . . . The last election, the Liberals promised a study on high-speed rail. It didn’t happen and now they’re doing it again,” he said.
“If you re-elect the Liberals, you’ll be talking about it for another 20 years.”
Brown pointed to the Grits’ mismanagement of the infrastructure portfolio as a major barrier to big-ticket projects like high-speed rail.
“Maybe if we weren’t . . . repaving the 403 every two years instead of every 15 years we would have funding available for great projects like high-speed rail,” he said.
“We need to have proper funding of infrastructure, we need to have value for money.”
Responding to the PC’s criticism the high-speed rail announcement is just a vote-grabbing ploy, Matthews said it’s a multibillion-dollar build that takes time to plan properly.
“It’s important that we do it right. I would hope that Patrick Brown would appreciate that, when you take on a project of this size, you have to really invest in the planning,” she said.
Even with an election less than a year away, Matthews is firmly committed to making the Liberals’ high-speed rail happen plan — but she’s disappointed the opposition isn’t fully on board.
On top of that, if he thinks repaving the 403 less is going to net you "high speed rail" to London, he really need to think harder.
In a sample of five highway jobs, the ministry paid $23 million in repairs after only one to three years. That’s on top of $143 million to do the paving jobs initially. All of the work should have had a life of 15 years.
I do hope high speed rail becomes an issue in the election and forces the Liberals to actually commit to some tighter deadlines and less nebulous scopes.
It definitely doesn't add up to the cost of a high-speed rail line, but I'd be interested in seeing how much it does add up to.
Gosh, he almost had my attention piqued for a nano-second there, until he said that. I can't even be bothered to read fully what he has stated if he's repeating nonsensical mantras.“We need to have proper funding of infrastructure, we need to have value for money.”
I do hope high speed rail becomes an issue in the election and forces the Liberals to actually commit to some tighter deadlines and less nebulous scopes (not just a "High speed rail soon!" sort of thing they've been doing ever since they announced high speed rail).
I do hope high speed rail becomes an issue in the election and forces the Liberals to actually commit to some tighter deadlines and less nebulous scopes (not just a "High speed rail soon!" sort of thing they've been doing ever since they announced high speed rail).
It's really sad because London really, really needs this. Yet, voters there don't seem to care enough to actually make it a key determinant of their vote.
We as a country has been studying high speed rail since the 1960s with no firm plans or projects.