nfitz
Superstar
Works even better when people don't respond to them.PS: I got curious and turned off "ignore", to my regret. It's going back on. Not much serious discussion going on here.
|
|
|
Works even better when people don't respond to them.PS: I got curious and turned off "ignore", to my regret. It's going back on. Not much serious discussion going on here.
THIS!Works even better when people don't respond to them.
You're trying to conflate tourist service with passenger service. Tourist services are purposely slower, daylight only and typically offer packages such as on-board food and hotel accommodations.In a simple reason, once it is gone,it is gone. Whether it be equipment, stations, skilled employees, etc, once the last train runs, all of that and more are gone.
Maybe the success of it would be if it operated differently.
For example, had the Charlevoix gone to the Gare du Palais and connected with the rest of the NA network, it may have attracted more passengers.
Another example would be for the Agawa Canyon train. Since there is a group of people who want a train along the route extended to Oba Lake, this could be operated in conjunction of it.
For the RMR, Maybe the problem with it is you need to spend a night in a hotel and you cannot do both ways.
Point is, maybe the problem is that the type of service is the problem.
If that is your rationale, we would keep running trains to prairie ghost towns. With nobody riding.
The whole point of making economic decisions is to derive the most utility from the money spent. Things that don't deliver utility do get shed. We may mourn a few, but then we move on.
One can make an individual sad story about the wilderness resident losing their train...,but is that utility worth the expenditure?
RMTR is run very well, thank you. And generates lots of wealth. But it is not transportation infrastructure . Mostly it's a tourism attraction. Sure, passengers get a ride to a destination, but the big utility is the experience. You could not shift much of the Calgary-Vancouver air or highway business to RMTR by running it differently.
RMTR runs both ways, and you can ride it both ways (if you can afford it).
Switching RMTR to an overnight train would be a disaster.... half the scenery goes by in the dark, and your train capacity (hence revenue) falls dramatically, and your overhead costs soar. The beauty of RMTR is it's an all-coach train with high seat density and simple (relatively) equipment. For the customer, sleeping in a motel in a bed that doesn't rock and roll in a much more spacious room is quite acceptable, because you get a second day's worth of scenery and first class service.
- Paul
You do you.PS: I got curious and turned off "ignore", to my regret. It's going back on. Not much serious discussion going on here.
You're trying to conflate tourist service with passenger service. Tourist services are purposely slower, daylight only and typically offer packages such as on-board food and hotel accommodations.
Charlevoix: Out to St. Anne de Beaupre *might* be within a commuter shed but that sounds like a city/province issue. Outside of that it gets pretty rural pretty quickly. Other than your train-from-everywhere-to-everywhere mantra, I don't (and apparently nobody else) see an economic base for passenger service.
On that note, depending on which website you read, either the tourist train or the whole line has be shut down, which would seem strange since their are/were active customers still on the line.
RMR: Some of their packages are circle, and you absolutely can take the one-ways in either direction. Bring a couple of well-stocked credit cards. Again, not a Point A-to Point-B passenger service.
Algoma: Other than the hamlet of Searchmount, the Agawa Canyon tour train services absolutely no communities. The main reason the Hearst-SSM passenger train could exist was Algoma Central was pretty flush with freight traffic from Wawa and Dubreuilville plus interchange traffic from Hearst at Oba. The first two no longer exist. As it stands now, most of the route doesn't have an economic foundation from any source. I don't know where the group that wants to start their train to nowhere expects to get their ridership. I was always curious about the original passenger traffic between the two end point as there is no natural connection (cultural, education, healthcare, etc.) between the two.
Edit: I'm repeating a lot of what Paul has already said.
That is where they need to look at their provincial counterparts. GO transit has buses that supplement the train. Ontario Northland has built up a robust bus service that will only complement the return of the train.I think the Greyhound business model needs to come into play here if you want to build a proper passenger rail network.
Partnering with bus companies is also a helpful strategy.
But right now even connections in the corridor suck. You can't get from Windsor to Ottawa in the afternoon without waiting for the next day. (Unless the train is exactly on time).That is where they need to look at their provincial counterparts. GO transit has buses that supplement the train. Ontario Northland has built up a robust bus service that will only complement the return of the train.
My thinking is that is ore to do with the lack of slots that are dictated by CN than Via doing anything. I doubt a bus will fix that. HxR should fix that.But right now even connections in the corridor suck. You can't get from Windsor to Ottawa in the afternoon without waiting for the next day. (Unless the train is exactly on time).
If train 76 is delayed you can't get on #48. 40min is kinda tight.
Well Trudeau stepped down today so unless pen has already been put to paper or will be in the next 60 days HFR is not getting built anytime soon.My thinking is that is ore to do with the lack of slots that are dictated by CN than Via doing anything. I doubt a bus will fix that. HxR should fix that.
I'm not sure about HFR, but I have no doubt the next PM will keep the latter.Well Trudeau stepped down today so unless pen has already been put to paper or will be in the next 60 days HFR is not getting built anytime soon.
You can also say goodbye to Universal Dental care, $15 a day child care, universal prescriptions for children and seniors.
He voted against all cost of living adjustments, any support for natives or the environment, basic income, tougher punishment for domestic violence repeat offenders, I can keep going.I'm not sure about HFR, but I have no doubt the next PM will keep the latter.
Well Trudeau stepped down today so unless pen has already been put to paper or will be in the next 60 days HFR is not getting built anytime soon.
You can also say goodbye to Universal Dental care, $15 a day child care, universal prescriptions for children and seniors.
Did he vote for anything?He voted against all cost of living adjustments, any support for natives or the environment, basic income, tougher punishment for domestic violence repeat offenders, I can keep going.
Votes - Pierre Poilievre - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada
Votes - Pierre Poilievre - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canadawww.ourcommons.ca
Hit the link and see for yourself.Time will tell what is gone and what remains. But,I do expect everything to be gone. The question is will PP get the super majority that was predicted or not, but this is not the thread to go down that.
Did he vote for anything?
That first page is a sad read.Hit the link and see for yourself.