TOBoy
Active Member
Yeah, you better check it out yourself. A couple of units I saw, I won't live in it even if it was free, I'm serious.
After looking at buildings like X, Charlie, Glas, Resin, those prices really aren't that bad. Under $300K for a 2 bed is decent.Really, you think so?
They are still asking ~$500 PSF even with the discounts.
After looking at buildings like X, Charlie, Glas, Resin, those prices really aren't that bad. Under $300K for a 2 bed is decent.
I'd have to see the models though...they layout/views might be crappy. Will most likely swing by tomorrow.
Most of the condos are a good 10-20K more with similar specs. Of course, those places are overpriced as well...I think most of the condos out there are overpriced and my colleagues feel the same way. I'm just comparing one overpriced condo to another and London works out to being cheaper.All that really tells me is that X, Charlie, Glas, Rezen, etc are that much more OVER-PRICED if $500 PSF sounds like a bargain to you.
$300K for 675 SF 2bed unit comes out to ~$450 PSF but the 2nd bedroom is really more like a den/home office.
Not trying to pick on you, but putting out feelers there to get some kind of consensus.
When you talk to friends and colleagues, do they think $500 PSF is reasonable and good value?
What age range do you fit under: 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; etc.
Thanks
Could you please point out the bad quality?Those prices are ridiculous for that building and the poor quality that's been displayed in the photos. 2bed in 675 sq. ft., you gotta be living in a closet!!
Those prices are ridiculous for that building and the poor quality that's been displayed in the photos. 2bed in 675 sq. ft., you gotta be living in a closet!!
Price list attached. Note that the price does not include the discount. I find the larger discount ones have really bad views.
thanks for the info.
are the prices shown on the pricesheet before or after the discount?
Some fixtures are those standard ugly 80's lights and some are track lighting. Etc. This was the same in the last condo we bought (Phoebe)1) Lighting fixtures from Home Hardware circa 1980
Edging was extra and we didn't feel it needed it. A thick countertop would just look heavy in a kitchen like that.2) 3/4" thin countertop instead of 1 1/2" (which I think is some sort of corian type thing and not granite/marble/quartz composite) - the least they could do is edge the countertop with another 3/4".
That's your personal preference. Seems to be the best way to lay it out given the shape of the kitchen.3) Awkwardly angled tile job in kitchen
We decided against hardwood in the kitchen because there's already a whole lot of very dark cupboards and this would have just been too much dark colouring for a small area. Plus we can avoid water damage from spills of all sorts like pets/children/etc.4) Tiles in the kitchen!! This isn't a builder's home in Whitby, it's a downtown condo - continue the damn hardwood!
There's a lot of the mirror not shown in the pic. It would look awkward to frame it.5) No framing of mirror in bathroom
There is.. you just can't see it. It's above the sink not above the toilet.6) No light above mirror in bathroom
Bathroom is way to small to put brown glass tiling all the way up. Though it is all the way up in the shower of course. This leaves a lot of room for artwork which I prefer over a bunch of glass that serves no purpose.7) 1/3 wall tile instead of the entire surround (regardless of whether it's only a tub or not) makes the entire bathroom look unfinished
The angle is deceptive but you can easily fit a bistro table and a couple chairs. or a bar table. You might be able to fit three chairs but any more than two people and we'll just be at the dining room table anyhow. It makes for a cute space in the condo.In addition, the eating area on the floorplan is completely useless in reality.