MacLac
Senior Member
But not the Parkallen proposal?
Paging @Marcolangzi for details on the latter.The Terrace and E. Rodriquez Mixed Use sound intriguing...
Oh? Rodriguez is a Marco project?Paging @Marcolangzi for details on the latter.
It appears his goup at Green Space Alliance (GSA) is the planning consultant.Oh? Rodriguez is a Marco project?
Is that this one?![]()
There's a sign on this building now with a render for what looks like a tear down and rebuild. Has a rooftop patio and looks to be about two-three stories.
Any idea if it's in the works?
No, this one is on Gateway.
This is interesting, given that the site was previously sold via judicial sale. Given the commercial aspect, they are likely trying to make the numbers work for financing.This was the plan - not sure what the status is since its a year old.
Major Development Permit
Reference Id: Job No 516911529-002 Description: To construct a mixed use 4 storey Residential and Commercial use Building with underground Parkade, including main floor Indoor Sales and Service, and 54 Multi-unit Housing dwellings. Location: 9950 - 82 AVENUE NW Plan I Blk 71 Lots 1-5 Applicant: DUALITA ARCHITECTURE Status: Tech Rev - More Info Requested Create Date: 2024/06/20 Neighbourhood: STRATHCONA
*fingers crossedThis is interesting, given that the site was previously sold via judicial sale. Given the commercial aspect, they are likely trying to make the numbers work for financing.
Maybe a response to a sunlight impact study? Odd shape.What's with that roofline?
Leston and ARH continue to expose us involuntarily to their acts of architectural greyscale violence.
View attachment 665079View attachment 665227
Am I the only one who is 100% okay with that first photo? The original colouring is hideous.Leston and ARH continue to expose us involuntarily to their acts of architectural greyscale violence.
View attachment 665079View attachment 665227




