Aladone
Active Member
Do you really want to go with the word “dull†in this instance? Also, forgive me if I fail to see what is particularly “urban†in the “new lookâ€. In any case, I think your thumbs are definitely pointed in the wrong direction—in fact if they are going to be pointing skyward in support of hack renos like that, I suggest we put them under (Bau)Haus arrest until they undergo the necessary retraining.
Honestly, I have no qualms about calling the “old look†dull. That’s the fist thing that came to my mind when I saw the picture. To me there’s nothing great about it, it looks like a couple of cardboard box with windows. There are no significant details to the building at all. Mind you, that may have been the “in design†of the time but compared to some of the other great historical architecture we have seen in this city this building, in my opinion, is lucky to be given a “dull†rating. I would call it a mediocre “dull†at best, and again that’s just my opinion. As Yonge street business fronts in the y2ks I don’t think anything could have been done any differently.
So, thank you for your opinion. Let’s face it; we all love the time traveling, the comparing of how things have change for both good and bad through these historical photographs. On my part, I don’t think any “retraining†will be necessary. In this instance it two thumbs up may have been premature. To me it sounds more like one thumb up and one thumb down.
Again, in my opinion (which we are all entitled to) I think the renos that have been made to this building are well suited for the times we are living in and the area in which the building is located. My thumb continues to point skyward!