|
|
|
Totally agree! The article mentions that some demolition lands could be converted to park or public space. Conversion to temporary parks/public space (or some other productive TLU) should be a condition of funding. Even if the park/public land use is through a lease to the City to manage liability. If the recipient doesn’t have a TLU planned (other than a parking lot), then they should not receive funding. I’d like to see TLUs where the lots are used for prefab/shipping container style bars/restaurants/breweries/markets. Something relatively low cost but highly activating.I like the idea of converting for other uses, but I'm not a fan of incentives to create more empty lots. I would be okay with incentives for demolition if it was tied to a new development taking it's place, but other than that I don't want to see money go towards more gravel lots. Also any build that does get demolished will likely be a smaller boutique building.
Next round of residential conversion projects announced...
Taylor Building - 85 units [Cressey Developments]
Petro Fina Building - 105 Units [People First Developments] (This one's pretty nice, In the document it says the historical elements will be preserved)
View attachment 470519
Eau Claire Place I - 90 Units [Cidex]
Eau Claire Place II - 195 Units [Pacific Reach Properties]
744 4th Ave - 55 Units [Institutional Mortgage Capital]
That's what I was thinking too. The facades on Fina and Taylor have a nice funkiness to them....just like the sierra building had. I pray they don't do too much to those buildings, but I have a feeling the retained historical element for Fina, will be the stainless steel portico.Both the Fina and Taylor buildings have a nice mid-century vibe...so I hope they don't go and ruin those facade's with some cheap patterned paneling.
The others, they can do whatever the hell they want with...