lenaitch
Senior Member
^^ For clarity, that's in Englehart.
|
|
|
This has been interesting. In my admittedly non-consistent travels, I can detect no discernable pattern to the upgrade of crossings. I would expect something like south-to-north, north-to-south, important/higher volume first, important/higher volume last, or something, but it seems completely random. I guess its irrelevant; they will get done eventually.
My theory on this is that they will run short trainsets along with refurb cab cars, but enough of them to allow MP40s and their cabs to be pulled off the line for ECTS installation and testing.
Apparently these F59's are going to ONR to be refurbished to be used by GO transit? Really?
So this was their locomotive procurement? Not new ones?My theory on this is that they will run short trainsets along with refurb cab cars, but enough of them to allow MP40s and their cabs to be pulled off the line for ECTS installation and testing.
may speak to the available market options especially now both MotivePower (MP40) and GE (HSP46) are not offering passenger locomotivesSo this was their locomotive procurement? Not new ones?
It's probably going to take 8-12 months to see these in service. Unless it's not a full overhaul just some lipstick.
I thought that MPI can still build the MP54?may speak to the available market options especially now both MotivePower (MP40) and GE (HSP46) are not offering passenger locomotives
In theory yes but they would have to stand up a line in Erie since the Boise plant is gone. Also, you would have to wonder how busy is Cummins making QSK95s for Siemens (each MP54 requires two QSK60s)I thought that MPI can still build the MP54?
I guess getting chargers has a backlog.
Maybe we should find away to open a plant here where they can make them.The government does grants and low cost loans for other entities, why not this too?In theory yes but they would have to stand up a line in Erie since the Boise plant is gone. Also, you would have to wonder how busy is Cummins making QSK95s for Siemens (each MP54 requires two QSK60s)
Put two QSK95s in a new MP model. 8800hp, MPI88. Let's go!In theory yes but they would have to stand up a line in Erie since the Boise plant is gone. Also, you would have to wonder how busy is Cummins making QSK95s for Siemens (each MP54 requires two QSK60s)
5,400 hp (4,000 kW) (MP54AC)Put two QSK95s in a new MP model. 8800hp, MPI88. Let's go!
That’s the 2 x QSK60 with no HEP engine, compared to the 4,000+1,000hp of the MP40 Tier 3. The thing is, MP40/54s are heavy by passenger locomotive standards - about 130 tonnes. That means more track forces, more wear and tear.5,400 hp (4,000 kW) (MP54AC)
The nominal loaded weight of a Metra EMD SD70MAC locomotive is 415,000 lbsThat’s the 2 x QSK60 with no HEP engine, compared to the 4,000+1,000hp of the MP40 Tier 3. The thing is, MP40/54s are heavy by passenger locomotive standards - about 130 tonnes. That means more track forces, more wear and tear.