News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

Shadows of the 2006 LRT plan:


http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/11/12/lrt-graveyard-in-barrhaven-gets-median-bus-lanes
LRT 'graveyard' in Barrhaven gets median bus lanes

Chapman Mills Dr. in Barrhaven shows the leftover scars from the carved-up north-south LRT plan.

It's not a particularly long stretch, but it's unusually wide. So wide, in fact, that the city can run a pair of bus lanes down the median.

"It's the graveyard of the LRT," Gloucester-South Nepean Coun. Steve Desroches said Wednesday. "But we were not going to give up that corridor."

Just after the morning commute, OC Transpo opened the special bus lanes that run up the gut of the road, plus a new station at Beatrice Dr. served by Route 99. The lanes and station cost about $5 million.

The previous north-south LRT blueprint, which was cancelled by council in 2006 in favour of the east-west track route currently under construction, made sure to have a wide Chapman Mills Dr. to handle the trains.

"This is the only part of the city we built up around LRT," Desroches said.

It's nice to see them use the corridor anyway! And frankly, it makes a lot more sense to build it up as BRT first, and allow LRT to come naturally as extensions from the north (Woodroffe) or east (the North-South LRT plan) as demand requires.
Later in the article, people start making the standard "what about the children?!" complaints. I'm not sure if these people realize that there are the exact same concerns with LRT. And the road was built with LRT planned. If you are truly worried about your children, then you have moved into the wrong neighbourhood.

To my knowledge, this the first in-median BRT corridor in Ottawa!
 
It is Ottawa's first in-median BRT. And it's the start of a series of them that are scheduled to be built over the next 10 years. One on Baseline (from Baseline Station to the Southeast Transitway), and another on March Road (from the 417 up to the business park).
 
Converting BRT's to LRT's is a problem in that they'll have to dig up the right-of-way to put in the foundation for the tracks, and the tracks themselves. BRT's should be built with the foundation already in place for future LRT use.
 
Is this appropriate? Preparing to build the new entrance for Station Rideau.

IMG_0544.PNG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0544.PNG
    IMG_0544.PNG
    844.7 KB · Views: 471
Converting BRT's to LRT's is a problem in that they'll have to dig up the right-of-way to put in the foundation for the tracks, and the tracks themselves. BRT's should be built with the foundation already in place for future LRT use.

Does it make sense to build the foundation when the LRT is only needed 25+ years in the future?
 
Converting BRT's to LRT's is a problem in that they'll have to dig up the right-of-way to put in the foundation for the tracks, and the tracks themselves. BRT's should be built with the foundation already in place for future LRT use.

It will be a very long time, if ever, before the Chapman Mills-Riverview BRT corridor needs to be converted to LRT. Heck it doesn't really even need BRT at this point. It would have functioned fine as a regular mixed traffic bus route for at least the next 10 years. Case in point, this corridor currently only has 30 minute service in the off-peak because of how premature it is (being a cross-suburban route through a suburb that is still developing).
 
Last edited:
It will be a very long time, if ever, before the Chapman Mills-Riverview BRT corridor needs to be converted to LRT. Heck it doesn't really even need BRT at this point. It would have functioned fine as a regular mixed traffic bus route for at least the next 10 years. Case in point, this corridor currently only has 30 minute service in the off-peak because of how premature it is (being a cross-suburban route through a suburb that is still developing).

Man, the old LRT plan really was a stinker. It really is amazing how it managed to get as far as it did.
 
Man, the old LRT plan really was a stinker. It really is amazing how it managed to get as far as it did.

It was nothing more than a plan concocted between the Mayor (Chiarelli) and developers in Riverside South and Barrhaven in order to boost the attractiveness of their holdings there. It would have put LRT tracks through corn fields while 80% of the rapid transit riders were still on buses.

I very rarely applaud seeing transit plans get canned, but I make an exception for that plan. I was quite happy when it was shot and buried in the backyard. The current plan is superior in pretty much every facet.
 
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/ncc-demands-new-options-for-western-lrt

The city says it has been blindsided by the National Capital Commission’s demand that transit planners reconsider the proposed route for western expansion of LRT.

At a Friday news conference convened minutes after Mayor Jim Watson and other senior city officials had been advised of its position, the NCC told reporters that Rochester Field on Richmond Road in Westboro, which it owns, is a better option for light rail than along the Ottawa River.

If, alternatively, the city is determined to have the light rail route run alongside the river, it should dig a deep tunnel for the trains, the NCC said.

The NCC said it supports the city’s western light rail transit project, but the two sides remain at odds over the 1.2-kilometre section of the proposed $980-million Richmond Underground line that would cross NCC land along the Sir John A. Macdonald Parkway.

The city wants to run the line through a trench, only 700 metres of which would be partly covered. But the NCC board declared in June 2013 that it would not approve the line unless it allows unimpeded access to the Ottawa River shoreline and has a “minimal visual impact” on the parkway corridor landscape.

At the same time, the board asked the city to present a detailed proposal for placing the entire 1.2-kilometre portion between Dominion and Cleary stations underground.

Now, based on what the NCC says is an “in-depth analysis” of data provided by the city in January, the NCC has concluded that the partially buried option on the parkway, which was put forward by the city for its ongoing environmental assessment study, doesn’t meet two conditions.

The NCC’s CEO, Mark Kristmanson, says the Rochester Field route provides a “comparable option” to study in the environmental assessment and would be similar in price to the city’s preferred option.

“The cost calculations come out roughly comparable based on the city’s own analysis,” he said.

However, it appears that the NCC hasn’t taken into account where the train would go after leaving the field.

There are only two options for that part of the route: the train would have to either run along Richmond Road or the Byron Linear Parkway, both in the heart of Westboro, which would be unpalatable to the community.

Click to enlarge graphic below.

NCC offers two choices for the western LRT

When the city studied the Rochester Field option in the past, it looked at running the train underground — the only option nearby residents would have accepted — and estimated the cost to be $1.7 billion. The city also found a tunnel along the river would vastly exceed its budget for the project.

NCC chair Russ Mills spoke with Mayor Jim Watson before Friday’s announcement, while Kristmanson phoned city manager Kent Kirkpatrick.

But city officials were not invited to the morning media briefing at the NCC’s Elgin Street headquarters and at least one city employee was turned away at the door.

Keith Egli, who chairs the city’s transportation committee, said later the city wants the NCC to share the analysis on which the board based its decision.

He added the city has a “clear mandate” to proceed with western light rail expansion.

“The people in Ottawa very clearly sent the message, ‘We want light rail, we want it out the west end, so we have to find a way to get there and in order to do that, we have to continue to talk with the NCC, but they have to share,” Egli said. “They have to tell us where they’re coming from, what their focus is, what their lens is in order to come to what they said, and we just don’t know that.”

When asked if there were possible political undertones to Friday’s surprise announcement by the NCC, Egli admitted the process was “out of the ordinary.”

The NCC board held an in-camera meeting this week, relied on information the city hasn’t seen to make its decision, then held a media event with little notice, Egli said, adding city staff had been planning to meet with the NCC in January to discuss the file. Friday’s announcement appears to have circumvented that.

“All bureaucracies have political masters, and you have to think that maybe that was part of the discussion,” Egli said.

But a spokesman for Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird — who is also an Ottawa MP and the senior minister for the National Capital Region — says politics isn’t at play.

“The NCC has an important responsibility to protect our nation’s capital and its green space. The city’s job is public transit,” said Adam Hodge in an email.

“We remain confident that both the NCC and the City of Ottawa can come to a decision that is beneficial for the people of Ottawa.”

Watson was in Toronto for meetings Friday. In a statement, the mayor said key issues affecting the city should not be discussed “at a secret meeting of an unelected, unaccountable body like the NCC.”

“We were promised a chance to appear before the NCC board in early 2015 to present a progress report. The NCC simply ignored their commitment to this and held a closed door meeting, jeopardizing our city’s transit plans,” Watson’s statement said.

Kristmanson dismissed suggestions the NCC blindsided the city, saying, “There will be lots of time to talk to the city about this,” he said.

If funding comes through, Phase 2 of the LRT would not be complete until 2023.

With files from Joanne Chianello
 
It disgusts me that in 2014 bureaucrats will still espouse the idea that car drivers deserve a scenic commute along a riverside parkway but transit riders not only do not deserve such treatment, but the sheer presence of a quiet, green LRT line will "destroy" the parkway altogether.

It's like the NCC is still stuck in the 1950s.
 
Here's the Croydon Tramlink running through Lloyd Park in London, UK:

1280px-Tram_in_Lloyd_Park,_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1624315.jpg


Tram_in_Lloyd_Park,_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1188255.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1280px-Tram_in_Lloyd_Park,_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1624315.jpg
    1280px-Tram_in_Lloyd_Park,_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1624315.jpg
    382.9 KB · Views: 295
  • Tram_in_Lloyd_Park,_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1188255.jpg
    Tram_in_Lloyd_Park,_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1188255.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 304
I, too, am curious to hear about the NCC's (apparent) secret plan to tunnel the Ottawa River Parkway, to provide uninterrupted access to the river.
 
Fear not, all. This NCC announcement is much more positive than you think. The NCC has banned shallow tunnels along its riverfront lands, but in return it is offering the city unconditional use of Rochester Field. A new alignment using Rochester Field to get down to Richmond, then a shallow cut and cover tunnel under the Byron Linear Park, is now possible. And it would be about the same cost, and offer opportunity to bring service closer to urban neighbourhoods.

The city's early estimates predicted that the route I described above would be $1.7B, because they planned a bored tunnel underneath Rochester Field & the Byron Park. Now that the NCC is allowing a surface route through it, that route is much cheaper.
 
Fear not, all. This NCC announcement is much more positive than you think. The NCC has banned shallow tunnels along its riverfront lands, but in return it is offering the city unconditional use of Rochester Field. A new alignment using Rochester Field to get down to Richmond, then a shallow cut and cover tunnel under the Byron Linear Park, is now possible. And it would be about the same cost, and offer opportunity to bring service closer to urban neighbourhoods.

The city's early estimates predicted that the route I described above would be $1.7B, because they planned a bored tunnel underneath Rochester Field & the Byron Park. Now that the NCC is allowing a surface route through it, that route is much cheaper.

Other than the fact, we tend to forget that not many people in that area takes the bus and that we're interested in improving the Transitway (as a regional commuting system). Therefore, I'm hoping that they seriously make us go backwards to an on-surface route through Richmond Road (slowing down the average speed compared to the current bus).
 

Back
Top