Armour
Senior Member
Thinkers? Let's not give him too much credit. His problem is that he can't think of ways to discuss social issues without resorting to unfounded labels to throw at anyone who doesn't agree with his superior wisdom. He uses his own, subjective criteria to justify this bizarre pattern of "thinking". If the mods will condone his labelling of others without proof, then anyone should be free to throw names back at him and people should start doing that so that he knows what those low blows feel like. Maybe, then, he will actually have a proper discussion and differing thoughts can be exchanged without childish games ensuing. It's funny how sure he is that others are racists and bigots, yet virtually no one agrees with him. If we only had such clarity. For someone that lives in a city replete with gray infrastructure/street furniture, you'd think he'd be aware of the fact that gray area applies to one's opinions and beliefs, and that not everything can be condensed down to a: black & white; us vs. them; 'either or' rationale. Just because someone poses thoughts that one disagrees with, that doesn't mean they are hating.That would've have sounded much better at half speed. Why don't people prep before public speaking?
I think Nfitz and like-thinkers are desperately lacking a term to apply to those they disagree with that has the equal weight of "racist".
Last edited: